Why the long face? Comparative shape analysis of miniature, pony, and other horse skulls reveals changes in ontogenetic growth.

Allometry Cranium Domestication Equus Falabella Geometric morphometrics Ontogeny Pony

Journal

PeerJ
ISSN: 2167-8359
Titre abrégé: PeerJ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101603425

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 12 04 2019
accepted: 15 08 2019
entrez: 3 10 2019
pubmed: 3 10 2019
medline: 3 10 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Much of the shape variation found in animals is based on allometry and heterochrony. Horses represent an excellent model to investigate patterns of size-shape variation among breeds that were intentionally bred for extreme small and large sizes. We tested whether ponies (wither height < 148 cm) have a diverging size-shape relationship in skull shape as compared to regular-sized horse breeds (wither height > 148 cm, here-after called horses) during ontogenetic growth. We used a dataset of 194 specimens from 25 horse and 13 pony breeds, two of which are miniature breeds (wither height < 96.5 cm)-Falabella, Shetland. We applied three-dimensional geometric morphometrics, linear measurements, and multivariate analyses (Procrustes ANOVAs) to quantitatively examine and compare the ontogenetic trajectories between pony and horse breeds with an emphasis on the miniature breeds as an extreme case of artificial selection on size. Additionally, we tested for juvenile characteristics in adult horse and miniature breeds that could resemble "paedomorphosis"-retention of juvenile characteristics in adult stage; e.g. large eyes, large braincase-to-face-relationship, and large head-to-body relationship. Allometric regression of size on shape revealed that 42% of shape variation could be explained by variation in size in all breeds. The ontogenetic trajectories of ponies and horses vary in slope and therefore in rate of change per unit size, and length. The differences in trajectory lengths and slopes result in ponies having a similar skull shape in an older age stage than horses of the same size in a younger age stage. This pattern could cause the generally perceived "paedomorphic" appearance of ponies. Miniature breeds have larger heads in relation to wither height compared to horses, a non-paedomorphic feature in horses specifically. Also, rostra (faces) are longer in adult individuals than in juveniles across all kinds of breeds. This pattern can be explained by the long-face hypothesis for grazing ungulates and could possibly be caused by the mismatch of selection by humans for shorter rostra and the dentition of ruminants. Miniature breed specimens do not exhibit any of the classical mammalian "paedomorphic" features (large orbits, large heads), except for the adult Falabella that has enlarged orbits, possibly because they are herbivorous ungulates that are affected by functional and metabolic constraints related to low nutrient-food consumption. Instead ponies, including miniature breeds, have faster and shorter ontogenetic growth compared to horses, resulting in adult pony skulls looking in part like juvenile horse skulls.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Much of the shape variation found in animals is based on allometry and heterochrony. Horses represent an excellent model to investigate patterns of size-shape variation among breeds that were intentionally bred for extreme small and large sizes.
METHODS METHODS
We tested whether ponies (wither height < 148 cm) have a diverging size-shape relationship in skull shape as compared to regular-sized horse breeds (wither height > 148 cm, here-after called horses) during ontogenetic growth. We used a dataset of 194 specimens from 25 horse and 13 pony breeds, two of which are miniature breeds (wither height < 96.5 cm)-Falabella, Shetland. We applied three-dimensional geometric morphometrics, linear measurements, and multivariate analyses (Procrustes ANOVAs) to quantitatively examine and compare the ontogenetic trajectories between pony and horse breeds with an emphasis on the miniature breeds as an extreme case of artificial selection on size. Additionally, we tested for juvenile characteristics in adult horse and miniature breeds that could resemble "paedomorphosis"-retention of juvenile characteristics in adult stage; e.g. large eyes, large braincase-to-face-relationship, and large head-to-body relationship.
RESULTS RESULTS
Allometric regression of size on shape revealed that 42% of shape variation could be explained by variation in size in all breeds. The ontogenetic trajectories of ponies and horses vary in slope and therefore in rate of change per unit size, and length. The differences in trajectory lengths and slopes result in ponies having a similar skull shape in an older age stage than horses of the same size in a younger age stage. This pattern could cause the generally perceived "paedomorphic" appearance of ponies. Miniature breeds have larger heads in relation to wither height compared to horses, a non-paedomorphic feature in horses specifically. Also, rostra (faces) are longer in adult individuals than in juveniles across all kinds of breeds. This pattern can be explained by the long-face hypothesis for grazing ungulates and could possibly be caused by the mismatch of selection by humans for shorter rostra and the dentition of ruminants.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Miniature breed specimens do not exhibit any of the classical mammalian "paedomorphic" features (large orbits, large heads), except for the adult Falabella that has enlarged orbits, possibly because they are herbivorous ungulates that are affected by functional and metabolic constraints related to low nutrient-food consumption. Instead ponies, including miniature breeds, have faster and shorter ontogenetic growth compared to horses, resulting in adult pony skulls looking in part like juvenile horse skulls.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31576240
doi: 10.7717/peerj.7678
pii: 7678
pmc: PMC6752190
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e7678

Informations de copyright

©2019 Heck et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Références

Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 18;7(1):13443
pubmed: 29044203
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2008;11(3):204-12
pubmed: 18569216
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 14;8(1):9129
pubmed: 29904085
Evolution. 1986 Mar;40(2):243-261
pubmed: 28556057
Vet Sci. 2017 Jan 24;4(1):null
pubmed: 29056664
R Soc Open Sci. 2017 Oct 25;4(10):170876
pubmed: 29134088
Evolution. 1984 Jan;38(1):1-15
pubmed: 28556070
Equine Vet J. 2006 Nov;38(7):646-51
pubmed: 17228580
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 26;8(12):e82686
pubmed: 24386109
Biol Lett. 2017 Aug;13(8):null
pubmed: 28794276
BMC Evol Biol. 2010 Jul 16;10:216
pubmed: 20637087
Evolution. 2016 Nov;70(11):2623-2631
pubmed: 27592864
J Vet Dent. 2012 Winter;29(4):250-2
pubmed: 23505788
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1988 Sep;77(1):117-32
pubmed: 3189517
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2016 Apr;299(4):412-20
pubmed: 26995336
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Jan 7;275(1630):71-6
pubmed: 17956847
Heredity (Edinb). 2015 Oct;115(4):357-65
pubmed: 25204302
Evolution. 2018 Apr;72(4):867-877
pubmed: 29518262
Nat Commun. 2013;4:2458
pubmed: 24045342
Evolution. 2002 Oct;56(10):1909-20
pubmed: 12449478

Auteurs

Laura Heck (L)

Palaeontologisches Institut und Museum, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

Marcelo R Sanchez-Villagra (MR)

Palaeontologisches Institut und Museum, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.

Madlen Stange (M)

Department of Biology & Redpath Museum, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

Classifications MeSH