Comparison of therapeutic effect of mucoadhesive nano-triamcinolone gel and conventional triamcinolone gel on oral lichen planus.
Mucoadhesive
oral lichen planus
triamcinolone acetonide
Journal
Dental research journal
ISSN: 1735-3327
Titre abrégé: Dent Res J (Isfahan)
Pays: Iran
ID NLM: 101471186
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez:
24
9
2019
pubmed:
24
9
2019
medline:
24
9
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic disease without any definitive treatment. Local corticosteroids are often prescribed, but their efficacy has been questioned by many studies. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of nano-based triamcinolone acetonide gel (NT) and compare it with conventional triamcinolone gel (CT) on OLP. In this triple-blind randomized clinical trial study, 40 patients with Erosive OLP were divided into two groups receiving (CT) and (NT). The patients were requested to apply them four times a day for 2 weeks. The severity of pain was evaluated through visual analog scale, the size of lesions was measured with paper lace, and the appearance of lesions was examined adopting Thongprasom scale . Findings will be significant via independent The severity of pain in NT group was 4.9 ± 0.7 cm before the treatment and 1.5 ± 0.9 after that, whereas in CT group, it was 4.9 ± 0.8 and 1.8 ± 0.9, respectively . The mean size of the lesions in NT group was 2.1 ± 1.1 cm before the treatment and 0.8 ± 1.1 afterward, whereas in CT group, was 2.2 ± 1.1 and 1.3 ± 1.1, respectively. The OLP appearance before and after the study in NT group was 4.5 ± 0.5 and 0.8 ± 0.6, respectively, whereas in CT group was 4.6 ± 0.5 and 0.9 ± 0.7 ( NT has a better impact on OLP in comparison with CT, but this difference is not statistically significant.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Oral lichen planus (OLP) is a chronic disease without any definitive treatment. Local corticosteroids are often prescribed, but their efficacy has been questioned by many studies. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of nano-based triamcinolone acetonide gel (NT) and compare it with conventional triamcinolone gel (CT) on OLP.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
In this triple-blind randomized clinical trial study, 40 patients with Erosive OLP were divided into two groups receiving (CT) and (NT). The patients were requested to apply them four times a day for 2 weeks. The severity of pain was evaluated through visual analog scale, the size of lesions was measured with paper lace, and the appearance of lesions was examined adopting Thongprasom scale . Findings will be significant via independent
RESULTS
RESULTS
The severity of pain in NT group was 4.9 ± 0.7 cm before the treatment and 1.5 ± 0.9 after that, whereas in CT group, it was 4.9 ± 0.8 and 1.8 ± 0.9, respectively . The mean size of the lesions in NT group was 2.1 ± 1.1 cm before the treatment and 0.8 ± 1.1 afterward, whereas in CT group, was 2.2 ± 1.1 and 1.3 ± 1.1, respectively. The OLP appearance before and after the study in NT group was 4.5 ± 0.5 and 0.8 ± 0.6, respectively, whereas in CT group was 4.6 ± 0.5 and 0.9 ± 0.7 (
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
NT has a better impact on OLP in comparison with CT, but this difference is not statistically significant.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
277-282Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors of this manuscript declare that they have no conflicts of interest, real or perceived, financial or non-financial in this article.
Références
Am Fam Physician. 2000 Jul 1;62(1):149-54, 160
pubmed: 10905785
J Oral Pathol Med. 1992 Nov;21(10):456-8
pubmed: 1460584
Br J Dermatol. 2004 May;150(5):984-90
pubmed: 15149513
J Am Dent Assoc. 2004 Sep;135(9):1279-86
pubmed: 15493392
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jan 30;104(5):1482-7
pubmed: 17244708
J Oral Sci. 2007 Jun;49(2):89-106
pubmed: 17634721
Med Hypotheses. 1991 Dec;36(4):341-4
pubmed: 1809853
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008 Apr;58(4):596-602
pubmed: 18158199
Indian J Dent Res. 2008 Apr-Jun;19(2):99-103
pubmed: 18445924
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Nov 17;106(46):19268-73
pubmed: 19901335
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010 Nov 01;15(6):e827-31
pubmed: 20526258
Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2010 Nov;76(3):437-42
pubmed: 20708076
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2007 Fall;1(3):99-102
pubmed: 23277842
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Mar;148(3):443-9
pubmed: 23325710
Nanomedicine (Lond). 2013 Dec;8(12):2061-75
pubmed: 24279493
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2013 Jul;15(7):600-4
pubmed: 24396581
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015 May 01;16(5):400-6
pubmed: 26162261
Adv Pharm Bull. 2015 Jun;5(2):277-82
pubmed: 26236668
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Feb;10(2):ZE10-5
pubmed: 27042598
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2016 Mar 15;4(1):158-63
pubmed: 27275352
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2016 Jul-Aug;82(4):371-8
pubmed: 27279294
Oral Dis. 2017 Jul;23(5):660-668
pubmed: 28168769
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993 Mar;75(3):397-402
pubmed: 8469556