Movement velocity can be used to estimate the relative load during the bench press and leg press exercises in older women.
Linear position transducer
Load-velocity profile
Older women
Resistance training
Velocity-based training
Journal
PeerJ
ISSN: 2167-8359
Titre abrégé: PeerJ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101603425
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
01
05
2019
accepted:
22
07
2019
entrez:
10
9
2019
pubmed:
10
9
2019
medline:
10
9
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Movement velocity has been proposed as an effective tool to prescribe the load during resistance training in young healthy adults. This study aimed to elucidate whether movement velocity could also be used to estimate the relative load (i.e., % of the one-repetition maximum (1RM)) in older women. A total of 22 older women (age = 68.2 ± 3.6 years, bench press 1RM = 22.3 ± 4.7 kg, leg press 1RM = 114.6 ± 15.9 kg) performed an incremental loading test during the free-weight bench press and the leg press exercises on two separate sessions. The mean velocity (MV) was collected with a linear position transducer. A strong linear relationship between MV and the relative load was observed for the bench press (%1RM = -130.4 MV + 119.3; These results suggest that the monitoring of MV could be useful to prescribe the loads during resistance training in older women. However, it should be noted that the MV associated with a given %1RM is significantly lower in older women compared to young healthy individuals.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Movement velocity has been proposed as an effective tool to prescribe the load during resistance training in young healthy adults. This study aimed to elucidate whether movement velocity could also be used to estimate the relative load (i.e., % of the one-repetition maximum (1RM)) in older women.
METHODS
METHODS
A total of 22 older women (age = 68.2 ± 3.6 years, bench press 1RM = 22.3 ± 4.7 kg, leg press 1RM = 114.6 ± 15.9 kg) performed an incremental loading test during the free-weight bench press and the leg press exercises on two separate sessions. The mean velocity (MV) was collected with a linear position transducer.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A strong linear relationship between MV and the relative load was observed for the bench press (%1RM = -130.4 MV + 119.3;
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
These results suggest that the monitoring of MV could be useful to prescribe the loads during resistance training in older women. However, it should be noted that the MV associated with a given %1RM is significantly lower in older women compared to young healthy individuals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31497399
doi: 10.7717/peerj.7533
pii: 7533
pmc: PMC6707344
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e7533Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Références
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 27;14(2):e0212085
pubmed: 30811432
J Hum Kinet. 2017 Mar 12;56:19-27
pubmed: 28469740
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018 Nov;28(11):2416-2426
pubmed: 29878445
Osteoporos Int. 2016 Feb;27(2):463-71
pubmed: 26194491
Clin Interv Aging. 2016 Dec 13;11:1797-1804
pubmed: 28008239
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Feb;31(2):292-297
pubmed: 27243918
J Sports Sci. 2016;34(12):1099-106
pubmed: 26395837
Exp Aging Res. 2018 May-Jun;44(3):258-269
pubmed: 29558320
Int J Sports Med. 2014 Mar;35(3):209-16
pubmed: 23900903
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 Mar;41(3):687-708
pubmed: 19204579
Exp Gerontol. 2018 Feb;102:51-58
pubmed: 29196141
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018 Mar 1;13(3):326-331
pubmed: 28714752
Age (Dordr). 2014 Apr;36(2):773-85
pubmed: 24030238
J Strength Cond Res. 2001 Nov;15(4):519-23
pubmed: 11726267
Nutrients. 2018 Mar 16;10(3):
pubmed: 29547573
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005 Nov;90(11):5970-7
pubmed: 16091494
J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Nov;34(11):3157-3163
pubmed: 33105366
Sports Biomech. 2019 Jun;18(3):245-255
pubmed: 29558855
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Apr;31(4):1127-1131
pubmed: 28328719
J Appl Biomech. 2018 Jun 1;34(3):184-190
pubmed: 29252060
Exp Gerontol. 2018 Jul 15;108:1-6
pubmed: 29567100
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2010 Feb;20(1):49-64
pubmed: 20487503
J Strength Cond Res. 2017 Jul;31(7):1897-1904
pubmed: 27669192
PeerJ. 2018 Apr 30;6:e4712
pubmed: 29736344
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Sep;33(9):2409-2419
pubmed: 31460988
Sports Biomech. 2019 Jul 12;:1-13
pubmed: 31296136
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 May;32(5):1440-1447
pubmed: 28486338
Int J Sports Med. 2017 Dec;38(14):1097-1104
pubmed: 29126339
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018 Apr 1;13(4):474-481
pubmed: 28872384
Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 22;8(1):1370
pubmed: 29358716
J Strength Cond Res. 2020 Apr;34(4):1024-1031
pubmed: 28885389
PeerJ. 2018 Jan 12;6:e4244
pubmed: 29340245
Adv Prev Med. 2011;2011:984683
pubmed: 21991450
J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Feb 06;:
pubmed: 30741875
Hypertension. 2011 Nov;58(5):950-8
pubmed: 21896934