Coronary artery fixation at iso-arterial pressure: impacts on histologic evaluation and clinical management.

Coronary angiography is the standard imaging method for determining the site, extent, and severity of coronary artery disease. Several publications have reported discordance between the degree of coronary artery stenosis determined from post-mortem histologic evaluation and coronary angiography. While the 2-dimensional limitations of coronary angiography are well established, the determination of coronary stenosis based on histologic evaluation of passively fixed samples is also associated with significant biases. In this study, we used patients with chronic coronary artery disease to compare the stenosis severity estimates that were determined using the passive fixation method with those determined using the active fixation method. Our results showed a significant discrepancy between the stenosis in passively fixed coronary arteries when compared with coronary angiography in all major coronary vessels combined (P=.002), and in Cx (P=.045) and CD (P=.026). However, there was no mean difference when compared with perfused (actively fixed) samples when all vessels were combined or examined individually. Iso-physiologic mechanical perfusion (active) fixation yielded significantly reduced coronary artery stenosis means when compared to the passive fixation method in post-mortem evaluations during autopsies. This was evident when all vessels were combined (P=.0001) and assessed individually (Cx (P=.003), LAD (P=.025), LM (P=.056) and RC (P=.007)). Autopsies including cardiac explant patients also showed differences in estimates for all vessels combined (P=.0001) and in Cx (P=.016) and RC (P=.006). In summary, our quantitative histopathology analyses using perfused coronary artery stenosis at physiologic pressure showed significant discrepancies when compared with passive histopathology.

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.