Are Anesthesiology Providers Good Guessers? Heart Rate and Oxygen Saturation Estimation in a Simulation Setting.
Journal
Anesthesiology research and practice
ISSN: 1687-6962
Titre abrégé: Anesthesiol Res Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101532982
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
22
04
2019
accepted:
04
06
2019
entrez:
21
8
2019
pubmed:
21
8
2019
medline:
21
8
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Anesthesia providers may need to interpret the output of vital sign monitors based on auditory cues, in the context of multitasking in the operating room. This study aims to evaluate the ability of different anesthesia providers to estimate heart rate and oxygen saturation in a simulation setting. Sixty anesthesia providers (residents, nurse anesthetics, and anesthesiologists) were studied. Four scenarios were arranged in a simulation context. Two baseline scenarios with and without waveform visual aid, and two scenarios with variation of heart rate and/or oxygen saturation were used to assess the accuracy of the estimation made by the participants. When the accurate threshold for the heart rate was set at less than 5 beats per minute, the providers only had a correct estimation at two baseline settings with visual aids ( The ability of anesthesia providers with different levels of experience to assess baseline and variations of heart rate and oxygen saturation is unsatisfactory, especially when oxygen desaturation and bradycardia coexist, and when the subject has less years of experience.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Anesthesia providers may need to interpret the output of vital sign monitors based on auditory cues, in the context of multitasking in the operating room. This study aims to evaluate the ability of different anesthesia providers to estimate heart rate and oxygen saturation in a simulation setting.
METHODS
METHODS
Sixty anesthesia providers (residents, nurse anesthetics, and anesthesiologists) were studied. Four scenarios were arranged in a simulation context. Two baseline scenarios with and without waveform visual aid, and two scenarios with variation of heart rate and/or oxygen saturation were used to assess the accuracy of the estimation made by the participants.
RESULTS
RESULTS
When the accurate threshold for the heart rate was set at less than 5 beats per minute, the providers only had a correct estimation at two baseline settings with visual aids (
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The ability of anesthesia providers with different levels of experience to assess baseline and variations of heart rate and oxygen saturation is unsatisfactory, especially when oxygen desaturation and bradycardia coexist, and when the subject has less years of experience.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31428146
doi: 10.1155/2019/5914305
pmc: PMC6679872
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
5914305Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Références
BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):774-7
pubmed: 10720365
Anaesthesia. 2001 May;56(5):488
pubmed: 11350345
Occup Environ Med. 2004 Feb;61(2):167-70
pubmed: 14739384
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Mar;7(3):308-13
pubmed: 14966522
Exp Brain Res. 2005 Feb;161(1):1-10
pubmed: 15551089
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Sep;25(1):161-8
pubmed: 15935624
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2005 Aug;33(4):497-500
pubmed: 16119492
Br J Sports Med. 1991 Sep;25(3):162-4
pubmed: 1777787
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1991 Nov;17(6):1136-45
pubmed: 1838386
J Clin Anesth. 1991 Sep-Oct;3(5):354-7
pubmed: 1931057
Can J Anaesth. 2010 Oct;57(10):888-97
pubmed: 20680710
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Feb 15;2 Suppl 1:S30-48
pubmed: 22682909
Anesthesiology. 2013 Feb;118(2):376-81
pubmed: 23263015
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Apr;29(2):151-9
pubmed: 23878432
Front Behav Neurosci. 2014 Oct 09;8:353
pubmed: 25346669
Appl Ergon. 2015 Nov;51:350-7
pubmed: 26154232
Anaesthesia. 2016 Jan;71(1):85-93
pubmed: 26582586
Anaesthesia. 2016 May;71(5):565-72
pubmed: 26990198
Anesth Analg. 2016 May;122(5):1395-403
pubmed: 27028772
Front Neurosci. 2016 Oct 25;10:464
pubmed: 27826221
Br J Anaesth. 2017 Dec 1;119(6):1224-1230
pubmed: 29045578
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;245:526-530
pubmed: 29295150