Angiography and Optical Coherence Tomography Assessment of the Drug-Coated Balloon ESSENTIAL for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis.


Journal

Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions
ISSN: 1878-0938
Titre abrégé: Cardiovasc Revasc Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101238551

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2020
Historique:
received: 02 04 2019
revised: 08 07 2019
accepted: 18 07 2019
pubmed: 12 8 2019
medline: 27 10 2020
entrez: 12 8 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

This study sought to assess the efficacy of the drug-coated balloon (DCB) ESSENTIAL for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR). DCBs have proven a valid therapeutic option for the management of ISR in several clinical trials, yet no class effect can be claimed. Accordingly, every new DCB model has to be individually evaluated through clinical studies. This is a prospective, multicenter study including consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ISR with the ESSENTIAL DCB. A 6-month quantitative coronary angiography (QCA)/optical coherence tomography (OCT) follow-up was scheduled. The primary endpoint was OCT-derived in-segment maximal area stenosis. Secondary endpoints included QCA-derived in-segment late lumen loss (LLL) and target lesion failure (TLF) rates at 6, 12, and 24 months. TLF was defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization. A total of 31 patients were successfully treated with DCB, with 67% of ISR corresponding to drug-eluting stents (DES). At 6 months, 26 patients underwent the scheduled angiographic follow-up. The mean value for in-segment maximal area stenosis was 51.4 ± 13% and the median value was 53% (IQR 46.4-59.5). In the DES-ISR subgroup, these parameters were 52.6 ± 10% and 55.2% (IQR 49.3-58.5), respectively. In-segment LLL was 0.25 ± 0.43 mm with only 2 (7.7%) patients showing binary restenosis (>50%). The incidence of TLF was 10% at 6 months, 13.3% at 12 months, and 13.3% at 24 months. In this study, the ESSENTIAL DCB showed sustained efficacy in the prevention of recurrent restenosis after treatment of ISR. We sought to assess the efficacy of the drug-coated balloon ESSENTIAL for the treatment of in-stent restenosis through a prospective, multicenter study including QCA and OCT assessment at 6-month follow-up. The primary endpoint was in-segment maximal area stenosis. Among the 31 patients successfully treated with the ESSENTIAL DCB, an angiographic follow-up was conducted in 26. Mean in-segment maximal area stenosis was 51.4 ± 13% and the median value was 53% (IQR 46.4-59.5). In the DES-ISR subgroup, corresponding values were 52.6 ± 10% and 55.2% (IQR 49.3-58.5), respectively. The observed in-segment LLL was 0.25 ± 0.43 mm and binary restenosis rate was 7.7%. TLF was 10% at 6 months and 13.3% at 12 and 24 months.

Sections du résumé

OBJECTIVES
This study sought to assess the efficacy of the drug-coated balloon (DCB) ESSENTIAL for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR).
BACKGROUND
DCBs have proven a valid therapeutic option for the management of ISR in several clinical trials, yet no class effect can be claimed. Accordingly, every new DCB model has to be individually evaluated through clinical studies.
METHODS
This is a prospective, multicenter study including consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ISR with the ESSENTIAL DCB. A 6-month quantitative coronary angiography (QCA)/optical coherence tomography (OCT) follow-up was scheduled. The primary endpoint was OCT-derived in-segment maximal area stenosis. Secondary endpoints included QCA-derived in-segment late lumen loss (LLL) and target lesion failure (TLF) rates at 6, 12, and 24 months. TLF was defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization.
RESULTS
A total of 31 patients were successfully treated with DCB, with 67% of ISR corresponding to drug-eluting stents (DES). At 6 months, 26 patients underwent the scheduled angiographic follow-up. The mean value for in-segment maximal area stenosis was 51.4 ± 13% and the median value was 53% (IQR 46.4-59.5). In the DES-ISR subgroup, these parameters were 52.6 ± 10% and 55.2% (IQR 49.3-58.5), respectively. In-segment LLL was 0.25 ± 0.43 mm with only 2 (7.7%) patients showing binary restenosis (>50%). The incidence of TLF was 10% at 6 months, 13.3% at 12 months, and 13.3% at 24 months.
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, the ESSENTIAL DCB showed sustained efficacy in the prevention of recurrent restenosis after treatment of ISR.
SUMMARY
We sought to assess the efficacy of the drug-coated balloon ESSENTIAL for the treatment of in-stent restenosis through a prospective, multicenter study including QCA and OCT assessment at 6-month follow-up. The primary endpoint was in-segment maximal area stenosis. Among the 31 patients successfully treated with the ESSENTIAL DCB, an angiographic follow-up was conducted in 26. Mean in-segment maximal area stenosis was 51.4 ± 13% and the median value was 53% (IQR 46.4-59.5). In the DES-ISR subgroup, corresponding values were 52.6 ± 10% and 55.2% (IQR 49.3-58.5), respectively. The observed in-segment LLL was 0.25 ± 0.43 mm and binary restenosis rate was 7.7%. TLF was 10% at 6 months and 13.3% at 12 and 24 months.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31401071
pii: S1553-8389(19)30433-6
doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.07.021
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Cardiovascular Agents 0
Coated Materials, Biocompatible 0
Paclitaxel P88XT4IS4D

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

508-513

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest Jose M. de la Torre Hernández Receipt of grants/research support: Abbott Medical; Biosensors; Bristol Myers Squibb; and Amgen. Receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: Boston Scientific; Medtronic; Biotronik; Astra Zeneca; and Daiichi-Sankyo. This work has not been published previously and it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The manuscript has been approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and if accepted, it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, including electronically without the written consent of the copyright-holder.

Auteurs

Jose M de la Torre Hernández (JM)

Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, Dpt. of Interventional Cardiology, Santander, Spain. Electronic address: he1thj@humv.es.

Tamara Garcia Camarero (T)

Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, Dpt. of Interventional Cardiology, Santander, Spain.

Fernando Lozano Ruiz-Poveda (F)

Hospital Universitario de Ciudad Real, Dpt. of Interventional Cardiology, Ciudad Real, Spain.

Cristóbal A Urbano-Carrillo (CA)

Hospital Regional Universitario Carlos Haya, Dpt. of Interventional Cardiology, Malaga, Spain.

Ignacio Sánchez Pérez (I)

Hospital Universitario de Ciudad Real, Dpt. of Interventional Cardiology, Ciudad Real, Spain.

Macarena Cano-García (M)

Hospital Regional Universitario Carlos Haya, Dpt. of Interventional Cardiology, Malaga, Spain.

Roberto Saez (R)

Hospital Universitario Basurto, Dpt. of Interventional Cardiology, Bilbao, Spain.

Abel Andrés Morist (A)

Hospital Universitario Basurto, Dpt. of Interventional Cardiology, Bilbao, Spain.

Eduardo Molina (E)

Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Dpt. of Interventional Cardiology, Granada, Spain.

Eduardo Pinar (E)

Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Dpt. of Interventional Cardiology, Murcia, Spain.

Alfonso Torres (A)

Hospital Universitario de Araba, Dpt. of Interventional Cardiology, Vitoria, Spain.

Eduardo J Lezcano (EJ)

Hospital San Pedro, Dpt. of Interventional Cardiology, Logroño, Spain.

Hipolito Gutierrez (H)

Hospital Clinico de Valladolid, ICICOR/Imaging Core Lab, Valladolid, Spain.

Roman J Arnold (RJ)

Hospital Clinico de Valladolid, ICICOR/Imaging Core Lab, Valladolid, Spain.

Javier Zueco (J)

Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla, Dpt. of Interventional Cardiology, Santander, Spain.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH