Neoadjuvant eribulin mesylate following anthracycline and taxane in triple negative breast cancer: Results from the HOPE study.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
04
03
2019
accepted:
15
07
2019
entrez:
8
8
2019
pubmed:
8
8
2019
medline:
18
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Eribulin mesylate (E) is indicated for metastatic breast cancer patients previously treated with anthracycline and taxane. We argued that E could also benefit patients eligible for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with primary triple negative breast cancer ≥2 cm received doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 x 4 cycles (AT) followed by E 1.4 mg/m2 x 4 cycles. Primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR) rate; secondary and explorative endpoints included clinical/metabolic response rates and safety, and biomarker analysis, respectively. Using a two-stage Simon design, 43 patients were to be included provided that 4 of 13 patients had achieved pCR in the first stage of the study. In stage I of the study 13 women were enrolled, median age 43 years, tumor size 2-5 cm in 9/13 (69%), positive nodal status in 8/13 (61%). Main grade 3 adverse event was neutropenia (related to AT and E in 4 and 2 cases, respectively). AT followed by E induced clinical complete + partial responses in 11/13 patients (85%), pCR in 3/13 (23%). Median measurements of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) resulted 13, 3, and 1.9 at baseline, after AT and E, respectively. Complete metabolic response (CMR) occurred after AT and after E in 2 and 3 cases, respectively. Notably, 2 of the 5 (40%) patients with CMR achieved pCR at surgery. Immunostaining of paired pre-/post-treatment tumor specimens showed a reduction of β-catenin, CyclinD1, Zeb-1, and c-myc expression, in the absence of N-cadherin modulation. The study was interrupted at stage I due to the lack of the required patients with pCR. Despite the early study closure, preoperative E following AT showed clinical and biological activity in triple negative breast cancer patients. Furthermore, the modulation of β-catenin pathway core proteins, supposedly outside the domain of epithelial-mesenchymal transition, claims for further investigation. EU Clinical Trial Register, EudraCT number 2012-004956-12.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Eribulin mesylate (E) is indicated for metastatic breast cancer patients previously treated with anthracycline and taxane. We argued that E could also benefit patients eligible for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
METHODS
Patients with primary triple negative breast cancer ≥2 cm received doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 x 4 cycles (AT) followed by E 1.4 mg/m2 x 4 cycles. Primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR) rate; secondary and explorative endpoints included clinical/metabolic response rates and safety, and biomarker analysis, respectively. Using a two-stage Simon design, 43 patients were to be included provided that 4 of 13 patients had achieved pCR in the first stage of the study.
RESULTS
In stage I of the study 13 women were enrolled, median age 43 years, tumor size 2-5 cm in 9/13 (69%), positive nodal status in 8/13 (61%). Main grade 3 adverse event was neutropenia (related to AT and E in 4 and 2 cases, respectively). AT followed by E induced clinical complete + partial responses in 11/13 patients (85%), pCR in 3/13 (23%). Median measurements of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) resulted 13, 3, and 1.9 at baseline, after AT and E, respectively. Complete metabolic response (CMR) occurred after AT and after E in 2 and 3 cases, respectively. Notably, 2 of the 5 (40%) patients with CMR achieved pCR at surgery. Immunostaining of paired pre-/post-treatment tumor specimens showed a reduction of β-catenin, CyclinD1, Zeb-1, and c-myc expression, in the absence of N-cadherin modulation. The study was interrupted at stage I due to the lack of the required patients with pCR.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite the early study closure, preoperative E following AT showed clinical and biological activity in triple negative breast cancer patients. Furthermore, the modulation of β-catenin pathway core proteins, supposedly outside the domain of epithelial-mesenchymal transition, claims for further investigation.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
EU Clinical Trial Register, EudraCT number 2012-004956-12.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31390375
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220644
pii: PONE-D-19-05793
pmc: PMC6685628
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anthracyclines
0
Bridged-Ring Compounds
0
Furans
0
Ketones
0
Taxoids
0
taxane
1605-68-1
eribulin
LR24G6354G
Banques de données
EudraCT
['2012-004956-12']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0220644Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
MEC, DG, LM, VT, FC, BP, GS, MCDS, MDN, AG, MPC, SF had no disclosures. SDC received speaking fees from Novartis Pharma; GVB received advisory boards from Eli Lilly, outside this work; NLV received speaking fees from Eisai, Teva and Novartis, advisory board from Celldex, research funding from Eisai, travel expenses for conferences participation from Pfizer, Gentili and Roche; AM received travel expenses for conferences participation from Brystol-Myers Squibb, Gentili, Roche and Merck; CT is a member of PLOS ONE Editorial Board. FdB received speakers bureau from BMS, ELI Lilly, Roche, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Gentili, Fondazione Menarini, Novartis, MSD, Ignyta, Bayer, Noema S.r.l., ACCMED, Dephaforum S.r.l., Nadirex, Roche, Biotechspert Lts, PriME Oncology, Pfizer, and is a consultant/advisory board member for BMS, TizianaLife Sciences, Celgene, Novartis, Servier, Phanm Research Associated, Daiichi Sankyo, Ignyta, Amgen, Pfizer, Roche, Teogarms, and Pierre Fabre. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 20;28(3):375-9
pubmed: 20008645
Eur J Cancer. 1999 Dec;35(13):1773-82
pubmed: 10673991
Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2016 Jun 28;10:77-84
pubmed: 27398025
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jan;19(1):27-39
pubmed: 29242041
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Mar;17(3):345-356
pubmed: 26869049
Br J Cancer. 2014 Mar 18;110(6):1497-505
pubmed: 24569463
Mol Cancer Ther. 2008 Jul;7(7):2003-11
pubmed: 18645010
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 29;9(8):e106131
pubmed: 25171249
J Clin Oncol. 2009 May 20;27(15):2474-81
pubmed: 19332727
N Engl J Med. 2010 Nov 11;363(20):1938-48
pubmed: 21067385
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Apr;180(3):647-655
pubmed: 32060783
Lancet. 2011 Mar 12;377(9769):914-23
pubmed: 21376385
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1145-53
pubmed: 20100965
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Dec;148(3):553-61
pubmed: 25381136
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jun 20;27(18):2954-61
pubmed: 19349550
Breast Care (Basel). 2017 Jul;12(3):152-158
pubmed: 28785182
Clin Breast Cancer. 2018 Dec;18(6):433-440.e1
pubmed: 29895438
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2008 Sep;62(4):667-72
pubmed: 18064460
Cancer Res. 2004 Aug 15;64(16):5760-6
pubmed: 15313917
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Mar 01;4(3):302-308
pubmed: 29327055
Lancet. 2012 Feb 4;379(9814):432-44
pubmed: 22152853
Clin Cancer Res. 2007 Apr 15;13(8):2329-34
pubmed: 17438091
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Jun;151(3):629-38
pubmed: 26006067
Mol Cancer Ther. 2005 Jul;4(7):1086-95
pubmed: 16020666
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Sep 1;28(25):3922-8
pubmed: 20679609
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Apr;19(4):497-509
pubmed: 29501363
Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Dec 15;11(24 Pt 1):8715-21
pubmed: 16361558
Cancer. 2010 Sep 15;116(18):4227-37
pubmed: 20549829
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Dec;136(3):795-804
pubmed: 23124476
Lancet. 2014 Jul 12;384(9938):164-72
pubmed: 24529560
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Jul;152(2):399-405
pubmed: 26126970