Assessment of Normative Range and Deriving Cut-Off Values for Lupus Anticoagulant Testing: An Experience from a Tertiary Care Center in Southern India.
Cut-off
LA-aPTT
Locally-derived
Lupus anticoagulant
Normalized ratio
Normative range
dRVVT
Journal
Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion
ISSN: 0971-4502
Titre abrégé: Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus
Pays: India
ID NLM: 9425818
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Jul 2019
Historique:
received:
17
10
2018
accepted:
11
01
2019
entrez:
8
8
2019
pubmed:
8
8
2019
medline:
8
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Lupus anticoagulant (LA) testing is a demanding laboratory test. The most common among recommended tests for LA are dilute Russell viper venom time (dRVVT) and LA sensitive activated partial thromboplastin time (LA-aPTT). Although integrated test systems come with manufacturer assigned cut-off, but according to guidelines cut-off should be locally-derived. This study was carried out to find normative range of LA using LA-aPTT and dRV VT tests in south Indian population (n = 100) and using locally derived cut-off values to interpret patient samples (n = 152) in a one-year study period. Cut-off (mean+2.3 SD) for aPTT, LA-aPTT, dRVVT screen and dRVVT confirm assays were 37.5, 45.7, 45.5 and 41.3 s and for normalized ratio and percentage correction of ratio were 1.16 and 15.8% respectively. Among patients, 25 (16.4%) were positive of whom 14 were positive by normalized ratio, seven by LA-aPTT and four were positive by both. Four additional patients could be identified using local cut-off. While the specificity of all screening tests was high, sensitivity of only dRVVT screen was high. All testing laboratories should attempt to derive normative range and locally-derived cut-off. While dRVVT is a good screening test with high sensitivity, however combining LA-aPTT offers advantage of picking up cases negative by dRVVT.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31388261
doi: 10.1007/s12288-019-01079-9
pii: 1079
pmc: PMC6646615
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
485-488Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Références
Br J Haematol. 2000 Dec;111(4):1230-5
pubmed: 11167766
J Thromb Haemost. 2009 Oct;7(10):1737-40
pubmed: 19624461
Br J Haematol. 2012 Apr;157(1):47-58
pubmed: 22313321
Semin Thromb Hemost. 2014 Mar;40(2):163-71
pubmed: 24500573