Assessment of Normative Range and Deriving Cut-Off Values for Lupus Anticoagulant Testing: An Experience from a Tertiary Care Center in Southern India.

Cut-off LA-aPTT Locally-derived Lupus anticoagulant Normalized ratio Normative range dRVVT

Journal

Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion
ISSN: 0971-4502
Titre abrégé: Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus
Pays: India
ID NLM: 9425818

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Historique:
received: 17 10 2018
accepted: 11 01 2019
entrez: 8 8 2019
pubmed: 8 8 2019
medline: 8 8 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Lupus anticoagulant (LA) testing is a demanding laboratory test. The most common among recommended tests for LA are dilute Russell viper venom time (dRVVT) and LA sensitive activated partial thromboplastin time (LA-aPTT). Although integrated test systems come with manufacturer assigned cut-off, but according to guidelines cut-off should be locally-derived. This study was carried out to find normative range of LA using LA-aPTT and dRV VT tests in south Indian population (n = 100) and using locally derived cut-off values to interpret patient samples (n = 152) in a one-year study period. Cut-off (mean+2.3 SD) for aPTT, LA-aPTT, dRVVT screen and dRVVT confirm assays were 37.5, 45.7, 45.5 and 41.3 s and for normalized ratio and percentage correction of ratio were 1.16 and 15.8% respectively. Among patients, 25 (16.4%) were positive of whom 14 were positive by normalized ratio, seven by LA-aPTT and four were positive by both. Four additional patients could be identified using local cut-off. While the specificity of all screening tests was high, sensitivity of only dRVVT screen was high. All testing laboratories should attempt to derive normative range and locally-derived cut-off. While dRVVT is a good screening test with high sensitivity, however combining LA-aPTT offers advantage of picking up cases negative by dRVVT.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31388261
doi: 10.1007/s12288-019-01079-9
pii: 1079
pmc: PMC6646615
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

485-488

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Références

Br J Haematol. 2000 Dec;111(4):1230-5
pubmed: 11167766
J Thromb Haemost. 2009 Oct;7(10):1737-40
pubmed: 19624461
Br J Haematol. 2012 Apr;157(1):47-58
pubmed: 22313321
Semin Thromb Hemost. 2014 Mar;40(2):163-71
pubmed: 24500573

Auteurs

Arikrishnan Ramaraj (A)

1Department of Pathology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, 605006 India.

Vir Singh Negi (VS)

2Department of Clinical Immunology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, 605006 India.

Rakhee Kar (R)

1Department of Pathology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, 605006 India.

Classifications MeSH