Simplified Rapid Protocol for Assessing the Thoracic Aortic Dimensions and Pathology with Noncontrast MR Angiography.

bright blood contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography dark blood noncontrast magnetic resonance angiography thoracic aortic assessments thoracic aortic measurements thoracic aortic pathologies

Journal

The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc
ISSN: 1061-1711
Titre abrégé: Int J Angiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9504821

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Historique:
entrez: 7 8 2019
pubmed: 7 8 2019
medline: 7 8 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) is limited by long acquisition time and contrast exposure in aortic emergencies. To compare the effcacy of dark blood (DB) and bright blood (BB) noncontrast sequences with the gold standard CE-MRA using a novel protocol for performing consistent thoracic aortic measurements and thoracic aortic pathologies identifications. A total of 66 patients with suspected or known thoracic aortic pathology who underwent CE-MRA underwent DB and BB imaging prior to CE-MRA for planning purposes. Aortic dimension was measured at 10 standard reference points in the ascending, arch, and descending aorta. Detection of aortic pathologies was recorded individually for each noncontrast sequence. When comparing the CE-MRA to the DB images and CE-MRA to the BB images, a majority of the measurement differences were less than or equal to 2 mm or resulted in no change of diagnostic class (95% for CE-MRA vs. DB and 96% for CE-MRA vs. BB). Of the patients who had major changes in diagnostic class (e.g., changes in two or three classes), the absolute measurements were not clinically significant in any given patient to warrant a change in management. Individually, the DB and BB sequences allowed for accurate recognition of all 47 aortic pathologies. DB and BB sequences produced comparable and consistent measurements of the thoracic aorta when compared with CE-MRA. In a situation where CE-MRA is not readily available or contraindicated, noncontrast MRA using our protocol is a reliable alternative to CE-MRA for assessment of aortic pathologies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31384111
doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1688473
pii: 180082
pmc: PMC6679965
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

130-136

Références

Int J Card Imaging. 2000 Jun;16(3):135-47
pubmed: 11144767
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001 Aug;14(2):113-9
pubmed: 11477668
Am J Cardiol. 2002 May 15;89(10):1235-8
pubmed: 12008187
Pediatr Radiol. 2005 Mar;35(3):323-6
pubmed: 15624110
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Feb;188(2):586-92
pubmed: 17242272
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2007 Dec;23(6):747-56
pubmed: 17285264
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007 Nov;22(11):3179-85
pubmed: 17890246
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Apr;190(4):902-6
pubmed: 18356435
Eur Radiol. 2010 Jun;20(6):1311-20
pubmed: 20013276
Tex Heart Inst J. 2010;37(1):58-65
pubmed: 20200628
Circulation. 2010 Apr 6;121(13):e266-369
pubmed: 20233780
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jun;15(6):651-8
pubmed: 24399340
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996 Jun;166(6):1387-97
pubmed: 8633452

Auteurs

Megha Verma (M)

Division of College of Arts and Sciences, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri.

Bharath Yarlagadda (B)

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Aditya Hendrani (A)

Division of Cardiovascular, Department of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Science Center, Shreveport, Louisiana.

Ambarish P Bhat (AP)

Department of Radiology, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, Missouri.

Senthil Kumar (S)

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, Missouri.

Classifications MeSH