Mandibulotomy Approach for Resection of Maxillary Tumours: A Clinical Review.
Infratemporal fossa
Mandible swing
Mandibulotomy
Maxillary tumours
Supraomohyoid neck dissection
Journal
Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery
ISSN: 0972-8279
Titre abrégé: J Maxillofac Oral Surg
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101538309
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2019
Sep 2019
Historique:
received:
25
05
2018
accepted:
03
10
2018
entrez:
3
8
2019
pubmed:
3
8
2019
medline:
3
8
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The objective of this study was to assess the accessibility in the resection of maxillary tumours, resection margin status, and morbidity following maxillectomy through lip split with paramedian mandibulotomy approach. A retrospective review of 20 consecutive patients who underwent maxillectomy with resection of primary tumours through lip split mandibulotomy approach with supraomohyoid neck dissection for maxillary tumours between 2008 and 2016. Patients details including the tumours site, extension and neck node involvement. were recorded. Resection technique, status of surgical resected margins was also discussed. Disease status was obtained from patients follow up records. Morbidity was assessed at mandibulotomy site in terms of infection, osteotomy healing, neural disturbance and mouth opening. The institutional research committee approval was taken for this study. All patients underwent adequate en bloc resection of the tumours, except in two patients in whom superior margins was positive. Osteotomy site healed well in our all patients except in one patient in whom there was infection at the osteotomy site during post radiation therapy. Minimal neural morbidity was encountered in four patients (three patients had lingual nerve hypothesia and two patients had inferior alveolar nerve hypothesia) which recovered in all four patients, over the 6th month post-operative period. Post-operative interincisal distance was satisfactory with a mean of 30.5 mm. Mandibulotomy with lip split is considered to be an ideal approach to access tumours of maxilla and its adjacent structures, SOHND with level III clearance. This approach provide excellent accessibility for en bloc resection of operable maxillary tumours with good outcome of resultant scar and minimal morbidity.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31371874
doi: 10.1007/s12663-018-1164-6
pii: 1164
pmc: PMC6639504
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
360-365Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Références
Cancer. 1999 Nov 1;86(9):1700-11
pubmed: 10547542
Head Neck. 2000 Mar;22(2):164-9
pubmed: 10679904
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001 Nov;59(11):1292-6
pubmed: 11688029
Yonsei Med J. 2004 Aug 31;45(4):621-8
pubmed: 15344202
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008 Jun;34(6):699-703
pubmed: 18029135
Oral Oncol. 2009 Aug;45(8):720-6
pubmed: 19103507
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Jun;67(6):1197-205
pubmed: 19446204
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Jul;69(7):2040-7
pubmed: 21458127
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990 May;116(5):596-9
pubmed: 2328117
Head Neck Surg. 1985 Jan-Feb;7(3):185-99
pubmed: 3972598
Am J Surg. 1984 Oct;148(4):534-8
pubmed: 6486323
J Laryngol Otol. 1982 Sep;96(9):817-36
pubmed: 7153645
Arch Otolaryngol. 1981 Nov;107(11):698-702
pubmed: 7295165
J Laryngol Otol. 1980 Feb;94(2):149-62
pubmed: 7373119
Am J Surg. 1993 Oct;166(4):431-4
pubmed: 8214309
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993 Sep;119(9):964-9
pubmed: 8357597
Head Neck. 1997 Jul;19(4):309-14
pubmed: 9213109
Cancer. 1998 Aug 1;83(3):457-65
pubmed: 9690538