Increased baseline ECG R-R dispersion predicts improvement in systolic function after atrial fibrillation ablation.
R-R dispersion
atrial fibrillation
cardiomyopathy
left ventricular function
Journal
Open heart
ISSN: 2053-3624
Titre abrégé: Open Heart
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101631219
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
30
10
2018
revised:
14
04
2019
accepted:
30
05
2019
entrez:
23
7
2019
pubmed:
23
7
2019
medline:
23
7
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction which may improve after AF ablation. We hypothesised that increased ventricular irregularity, as measured by R-R dispersion on the baseline ECG, would predict improvement in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after AF ablation. Patients with LVEF <50% at two US centres (2007-2016), having both a preablation and postablation echocardiogram or cardiac MRI, were included. LVEF improvement was defined as absolute increase in LVEF by >7.5%. Multivariable logistic regression (restricted to echocardiographic/ECG variables) was performed to evaluate predictors of LVEF improvement. Fifty-two patients were included in this study. LVEF improved in 30 patients (58%) and was unchanged/worsened in 22 patients (42%). Those with versus without LVEF improvement had an increased baseline R-R dispersion (645±155 ms vs 537±154 ms, p=0.02, respectively). The average baseline heart rate in all patients was 93 beats per minute. After multivariable logistic regression, increased R-R dispersion (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.55, p=0.03) predicted LVEF improvement. Increased R-R dispersion on ECG was independently associated with improved systolic function after AF ablation. This broadens the existing knowledge of arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy, demonstrating that irregular electrical activation (as measured by increased R-R dispersion on ECG) is associated with a cardiomyopathy capable of improving after AF ablation.
Sections du résumé
Background
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction which may improve after AF ablation. We hypothesised that increased ventricular irregularity, as measured by R-R dispersion on the baseline ECG, would predict improvement in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after AF ablation.
Methods
Patients with LVEF <50% at two US centres (2007-2016), having both a preablation and postablation echocardiogram or cardiac MRI, were included. LVEF improvement was defined as absolute increase in LVEF by >7.5%. Multivariable logistic regression (restricted to echocardiographic/ECG variables) was performed to evaluate predictors of LVEF improvement.
Results
Fifty-two patients were included in this study. LVEF improved in 30 patients (58%) and was unchanged/worsened in 22 patients (42%). Those with versus without LVEF improvement had an increased baseline R-R dispersion (645±155 ms vs 537±154 ms, p=0.02, respectively). The average baseline heart rate in all patients was 93 beats per minute. After multivariable logistic regression, increased R-R dispersion (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.00 to 2.55, p=0.03) predicted LVEF improvement.
Conclusions
Increased R-R dispersion on ECG was independently associated with improved systolic function after AF ablation. This broadens the existing knowledge of arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy, demonstrating that irregular electrical activation (as measured by increased R-R dispersion on ECG) is associated with a cardiomyopathy capable of improving after AF ablation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31328002
doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2018-000958
pii: openhrt-2018-000958
pmc: PMC6609144
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e000958Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 2;351(23):2373-83
pubmed: 15575053
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005 Dec;18(12):1440-63
pubmed: 16376782
Clin Cardiol. 2008 Apr;31(4):172-8
pubmed: 18404727
Circulation. 2009 May 12;119(18):2516-25
pubmed: 19433768
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2009 Aug 25;7:41
pubmed: 19706183
Heart Fail Clin. 2010 Apr;6(2):187-200
pubmed: 20347787
Circ Heart Fail. 2012 Nov;5(6):786-93
pubmed: 23014130
J Card Fail. 2013 Jan;19(1):40-9
pubmed: 23273593
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Oct 17;70(16):1949-1961
pubmed: 28855115
Am Heart J. 1983 Aug;106(2):284-91
pubmed: 6869209
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Oct;30(4):1039-45
pubmed: 9316536