The Role of Self-Control and the Presence of Enactment Models on Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption: A Pilot Study.
diet
ecological momentary assessment
self-control
social norms
sugar-sweetened beverages
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
02
05
2019
accepted:
14
06
2019
entrez:
18
7
2019
pubmed:
18
7
2019
medline:
18
7
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The objective of the present research was to investigate associations of dispositional and momentary self-control and the presence of other individuals consuming SSBs with the consumption frequency of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) in a multi-country pilot study. We conducted an Ambulatory Assessment in which 75 university students (52 females) from four study sites carried smartphones and received prompts six times a day in their everyday environments to capture information regarding momentary self-control and the presence of other individuals consuming SSBs. Multilevel models revealed a statistically significant negative association between dispositional self-control and SSB consumption. Moreover, having more self-control than usual was only beneficial in regard to lower SSB consumption frequency, when other individuals consuming SSBs were not present but not when they were present. The findings support the hypothesis that self-control is an important factor regarding SSB consumption. This early evidence highlights self-control as a candidate to design interventions to promote healthier drinking through improved self-control.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31312162
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01511
pmc: PMC6614438
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1511Références
Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2002 Sep;5(5):489-93
pubmed: 12172471
J Pers. 2004 Apr;72(2):271-324
pubmed: 15016066
Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Aug;84(2):274-88
pubmed: 16895873
Psychol Sci. 2007 May;18(5):429-34
pubmed: 17576283
N Engl J Med. 2007 Jul 26;357(4):370-9
pubmed: 17652652
J Abnorm Psychol. 2008 Nov;117(4):924-35
pubmed: 19025237
Psychol Sci. 2011 Jul;22(7):968-75
pubmed: 21685380
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Jun;102(6):1318-35
pubmed: 22149456
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012 Mar-Apr;44(2):172-7
pubmed: 22154130
Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Mar;16(3):174-80
pubmed: 22336729
Psychosom Med. 2012 May;74(4):325-6
pubmed: 22582329
Psychosom Med. 2012 May;74(4):327-37
pubmed: 22582330
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2013;9:151-76
pubmed: 23157450
Psychol Rev. 2013 Jan;120(1):110-38
pubmed: 23230892
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013 Jan;113(1):43-53
pubmed: 23260723
Appetite. 2013 Jun;65:83-9
pubmed: 23402712
Front Psychol. 2013 Sep 02;4:577
pubmed: 24032024
Appetite. 2014 Mar;74:101-6
pubmed: 24333943
Appetite. 2014 Oct;81:180-92
pubmed: 24949566
BMC Med. 2015 Apr 16;13:84
pubmed: 25907778
J Pers. 2016 Dec;84(6):789-798
pubmed: 26269964
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Feb;61:177-96
pubmed: 26698021
Annu Rev Public Health. 2016;37:273-93
pubmed: 26989829
Health Psychol Rev. 2017 Mar;11(1):89-99
pubmed: 27899059
Appetite. 2018 May 1;124:4-9
pubmed: 28551113
Nutrients. 2017 Oct 27;9(11):null
pubmed: 29077027
Int J Obes (Lond). 2018 Apr;42(4):655-661
pubmed: 29089612
Appetite. 2018 Apr 1;123:152-159
pubmed: 29269316