Clinical and equipment-related factors associated with the adequate peripheral blood stem cell collection in autologous transplant at a tertiary cancer center in Kerala - A retrospective cohort study.


Journal

Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis
ISSN: 1473-0502
Titre abrégé: Transfus Apher Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101095653

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2019
Historique:
received: 04 03 2019
accepted: 01 05 2019
pubmed: 1 7 2019
medline: 23 1 2020
entrez: 1 7 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

PBSC collection using apheresis is the preferred source of hematopoietic stem cells transplantation. However, apheresis procedures fail to harvest adequate CD34 yield in 5 to 40% of patients during the first collection. Therefore, this study aimed to study both the clinical- and equipmentrelated factors influencing CD34 yield among the autologous patients and to compare the collection efficiency of two apheresis equipments(Haemonetics MCS+ and Terumo Spectra Optia). Retrospective analysis of 69 patients underwent PBSC collection from 2015 to 2018. Frequency, clinical- and equipment-related factors responsible for adequate CD34+ cells (≥2 x106 cells/kg) yield during the first collection was studied. Factors such as collection efficiency, percentage platelet loss and percentage hemoglobin loss were considered to compare the two apheresis system. Two-third (72%) patients of the study population had adequate CD34 stem cells yield during the first collection. Factors such as exposure to lenalidomide-based pretreatment regimen, peripheral blood WBC count and CD34 count are associated with the adequate CD34 yield. Optia had a slightly better collection efficiency than MCS+ (50 and 44; p=0.37). Optia had lower product volume (237 vs 298 ml) and lesser procedure duration (277 vs 360 min), whereas the median Hb loss (3.0% and 2.3%) and mean platelet loss (49% and 34%) were higher with MCS. This study infers that the collection efficiency of both the equipments in collecting CD34 stem cells was similar. However, during PBSC collection, procedures using Optia can be preferred to MCS+ on the patients with risk of anemia and thrombocytopenia.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
PBSC collection using apheresis is the preferred source of hematopoietic stem cells transplantation. However, apheresis procedures fail to harvest adequate CD34 yield in 5 to 40% of patients during the first collection. Therefore, this study aimed to study both the clinical- and equipmentrelated factors influencing CD34 yield among the autologous patients and to compare the collection efficiency of two apheresis equipments(Haemonetics MCS+ and Terumo Spectra Optia).
METHODS METHODS
Retrospective analysis of 69 patients underwent PBSC collection from 2015 to 2018. Frequency, clinical- and equipment-related factors responsible for adequate CD34+ cells (≥2 x106 cells/kg) yield during the first collection was studied. Factors such as collection efficiency, percentage platelet loss and percentage hemoglobin loss were considered to compare the two apheresis system.
RESULTS RESULTS
Two-third (72%) patients of the study population had adequate CD34 stem cells yield during the first collection. Factors such as exposure to lenalidomide-based pretreatment regimen, peripheral blood WBC count and CD34 count are associated with the adequate CD34 yield. Optia had a slightly better collection efficiency than MCS+ (50 and 44; p=0.37). Optia had lower product volume (237 vs 298 ml) and lesser procedure duration (277 vs 360 min), whereas the median Hb loss (3.0% and 2.3%) and mean platelet loss (49% and 34%) were higher with MCS.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
This study infers that the collection efficiency of both the equipments in collecting CD34 stem cells was similar. However, during PBSC collection, procedures using Optia can be preferred to MCS+ on the patients with risk of anemia and thrombocytopenia.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31255504
pii: S1473-0502(19)30094-1
doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2019.05.007
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Pagination

457-463

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Auteurs

M Murugesan (M)

Dept. of Transfusion Medicine, Malabar Cancer Centre, Thalassery, Kerala, India. Electronic address: drmohandossm@gmail.com.

K Shringarpure (K)

Dept. of PSM, Medical College Baroda, Gujarat, India.

D S A Karthickeyan (DSA)

Academy for Public Health, Calicut, Kerala, India.

C K Nair (CK)

Dept. of Clinical Hematology, Malabar Cancer Centre, Thalassery, Kerala, India.

S K Nayanar (SK)

Dept. of Oncopathology, Malabar Cancer Centre, Thalassery, Kerala, India.

V Venugopal (V)

Dept. of Community Medicine, Sri Manakula Vinayagar Medical College, Puducherry, India.

K Selvaraj (K)

Dept. of Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, India.

P Rathi (P)

Dept. of Community Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, India.

K G Mehta (KG)

Community Medicine Department, GMERS Medical college Gotri, Vadodara, India.

V Deenathayalan (V)

Academy for Public Health, Calicut, Kerala, India.

K C Gayathiri (KC)

Dept. of Transfusion Medicine, Malabar Cancer Centre, Thalassery, Kerala, India.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH