Utility of Supplemental Training to Improve Radiologist Performance in Breast Cancer Screening: A Literature Review.


Journal

Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR
ISSN: 1558-349X
Titre abrégé: J Am Coll Radiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101190326

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Historique:
received: 19 12 2018
revised: 23 04 2019
accepted: 23 04 2019
pubmed: 28 6 2019
medline: 17 9 2020
entrez: 28 6 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The authors evaluate whether supplemental training for radiologists improves their breast screening performance and how this is measured. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed on August 3, 2017. Articles were included if they described supplemental training for radiologists reading mammograms to improve their breast screening performance and at least one outcome measure was reported. Study quality was assessed using the Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument. Of 2,199 identified articles, 18 were included, of which 17 showed improvement on at least one of the outcome measures, for at least one training activity or subgroup. Two measurement approaches were found. For the first approach, measuring performance on test sets, sensitivity, and specificity were the most reported outcomes (8 of 11 studies). Recall rate is the most reported outcome (6 of 7 studies) for the second approach, which measures performance in actual screening practice. The studies were mainly of moderate quality (Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument score 11.7 ± 1.7), caused by small sample sizes and the lack of a control group. Supplemental training helps radiologists improve their screening performance, despite the mainly moderate quality of the studies. There is a need for better designed studies. Future studies should focus on performance in actual screening practice and should look for methods to isolate the training effect. If test sets are used, focus should be on knowledge about correlation between performance on test sets and actual screening practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31247156
pii: S1546-1440(19)30465-X
doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.04.016
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1528-1546

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Tanya D Geertse (TD)

Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: t.geertse@lrcb.nl.

Ellen Paap (E)

Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Daniëlle van der Waal (D)

Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Lucien E M Duijm (LEM)

Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Ruud M Pijnappel (RM)

Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Mireille J M Broeders (MJM)

Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH