Does preoperative deformity diminish radiographic outcome after hallux valgus correction with scarf osteotomy?: A retrospective study of 102 cases.
Hallux valgus
Loss of correction
Preoperative deformity
Prognostic factors
Radiological outcome
Scarf osteotomy
Journal
Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons
ISSN: 1460-9584
Titre abrégé: Foot Ankle Surg
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9609647
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Jun 2020
Historique:
received:
11
08
2018
revised:
25
02
2019
accepted:
13
05
2019
pubmed:
17
6
2019
medline:
18
11
2020
entrez:
17
6
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Scarf osteotomy is a frequently used technique to correct moderate to severe hallux valgus deformities. Recurrence of a deformity is a commonly reported complication after surgery. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of preoperative deformity on radiological outcome in terms of postoperative loss of correction after scarf osteotomy. 102 patients, in which a hallux valgus deformity was corrected with an isolated scarf osteotomy were included. Weightbearing radiographs were analyzed preoperatively, postoperatively, after 6 weeks and after three months (mean 10.9 months SD 17.2 months). The following radiological parameters were used for analysis: the intermetatarsal angle (IMA), the hallux valgus angle (HVA), the distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA), position of the sesamoids, first metatarsal length, and first metatarsophalangeal joint congruity. Significant correction of IMA, HVA, DMAA, sesamoid position and joint congruity was achieved (p < 0.001). The IMA improved from 15.8 ± 2.3 to 4.3 ± 2.8°, the HVA from 32.6 ± 6.8 to 9.1 ± 7.2, and the DMAA from 11.4 ± 6.9 to 8.4 ± 5.2°, respectively. In contrast to DMAA, throughout followup we could detect loss of correction for HVA and for IMA amounting 6.3° ± 5.8 and 3.8° ± 2.8 respectively. Loss of HVA correction revealed a significant correlation with preoperative DMAA, but not with the other preoperative radiological parameters. Preoperative deformity does not correlate with postoperative loss of correction after scarf osteotomy, except DMAA. Our results may be helpful in counseling patients regarding recurrence of hallux valgus deformity after scarf osteotomy. Therapeutic, Level IV, retrospective case series.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Scarf osteotomy is a frequently used technique to correct moderate to severe hallux valgus deformities. Recurrence of a deformity is a commonly reported complication after surgery. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of preoperative deformity on radiological outcome in terms of postoperative loss of correction after scarf osteotomy.
METHODS
METHODS
102 patients, in which a hallux valgus deformity was corrected with an isolated scarf osteotomy were included. Weightbearing radiographs were analyzed preoperatively, postoperatively, after 6 weeks and after three months (mean 10.9 months SD 17.2 months). The following radiological parameters were used for analysis: the intermetatarsal angle (IMA), the hallux valgus angle (HVA), the distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA), position of the sesamoids, first metatarsal length, and first metatarsophalangeal joint congruity.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Significant correction of IMA, HVA, DMAA, sesamoid position and joint congruity was achieved (p < 0.001). The IMA improved from 15.8 ± 2.3 to 4.3 ± 2.8°, the HVA from 32.6 ± 6.8 to 9.1 ± 7.2, and the DMAA from 11.4 ± 6.9 to 8.4 ± 5.2°, respectively. In contrast to DMAA, throughout followup we could detect loss of correction for HVA and for IMA amounting 6.3° ± 5.8 and 3.8° ± 2.8 respectively. Loss of HVA correction revealed a significant correlation with preoperative DMAA, but not with the other preoperative radiological parameters.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Preoperative deformity does not correlate with postoperative loss of correction after scarf osteotomy, except DMAA.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
CONCLUSIONS
Our results may be helpful in counseling patients regarding recurrence of hallux valgus deformity after scarf osteotomy.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
METHODS
Therapeutic, Level IV, retrospective case series.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31202526
pii: S1268-7731(18)30338-2
doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2019.05.007
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
425-431Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.