Unmet need for interprofessional education in paediatric cancer: a scoping review.
Cancer
Curriculum
Evaluation
Interprofessional education
Paediatric oncology
Journal
Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer
ISSN: 1433-7339
Titre abrégé: Support Care Cancer
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9302957
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2019
Oct 2019
Historique:
received:
13
09
2018
accepted:
09
05
2019
pubmed:
28
5
2019
medline:
14
11
2019
entrez:
26
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Despite improved treatment and care, children and adolescents diagnosed with cancer continue to die, while many of those cured are burdened by treatment-related sequelae. The best clinical management of children and adolescents with cancer depends on healthcare professionals with various skills and expertise. Complex treatment, care and rehabilitation require collaboration between healthcare professionals. The purpose of this scoping review is to identify and evaluate existing interprofessional education in paediatric cancer. We utilised the scoping review methodology and searched PubMed, Scopus and Education Resources Information Center. Inclusion criteria were postgraduate studies targeting more than one profession and evaluation of the educational intervention. We applied Kirkpatrick's modified interprofessional education outcomes model to systematise outcomes. Of 418 references, nine studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The design, strategy and content of all the studies were heterogeneous. None of the interprofessional educations systematically evaluated knowledge, skills, attitudes or the effects on patient outcomes or quality of care. There is a lack of well-structured, interprofessional education in paediatric cancer that has undergone evaluation. Paediatric cancer may benefit from systematic education and evaluation frameworks since interprofessional education could potentially strengthen the treatment, care and rehabilitation for children and adolescents with cancer.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31127437
doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04856-4
pii: 10.1007/s00520-019-04856-4
pmc: PMC6726701
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3627-3637Subventions
Organisme : Børnecancerfonden
ID : 2015-73
Références
Gatta G, Botta L, Rossi S, Aareleid T, Bielska-Lasota M, Clavel J, Dimitrova N, Jakab Z, Kaatsch P, Lacour B, Mallone S, Marcos-Gragera R, Minicozzi P, Sánchez-Pérez MJ, Sant M, Santaquilani M, Stiller C, Tavilla A, Trama A, Visser O, Peris-Bonet R, EUROCARE Working Group (2014) Childhood cancer survival in Europe 1999-2007: results of EUROCARE-5--a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 15(1):35–47
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70548-5
pubmed: 24314616
Alexander S, Pole JD, Gibson P, Lee M, Hesser T, Chi SN et al (2015) Classification of treatment-related mortality in children with cancer: a systematic assessment. Lancet Oncol 16(16):e604–e610
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00197-7
pubmed: 26678213
Anderson RA, Marshall NS (2000) The importance of the pediatric oncologist-nurse partnership in the delivery of total care in pediatric oncology. Med Pediatr Oncol 34(4):263–264
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-911X(200004)34:4<263::AID-MPO7>3.0.CO;2-A
pubmed: 10742064
Hjorth L, Haupt R, Skinner R, Grabow D, Byrne J, Karner S, Levitt G, Michel G, van der Pal H, Bárdi E, Beck JD, de Vathaire F, Essig S, Frey E, Garwicz S, Hawkins M, Jakab Z, Jankovic M, Kazanowska B, Kepak T, Kremer L, Lackner H, Sugden E, Terenziani M, Zaletel LZ, Kaatsch P, PanCare Network (2015) Survivorship after childhood cancer: PanCare: a European network to promote optimal long-term care. Eur J Cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) 51(10):1203–1211
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.04.002
Andam R, Silva M (2008) A journey to pediatric chemotherapy competence. J Pediatr Nurs 23(4):257–268
doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2006.12.005
pubmed: 18638670
Gibson F (2009) Multiprofessional collaboration in children’s cancer care: believed to be a good thing but how do we know when it works well? Eur J Cancer Care 18(4):327–329
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2009.01131.x
Reaman GH (2004) Pediatric cancer research from past successes through collaboration to future transdisciplinary research. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 21(3):123–127
doi: 10.1177/1043454204264406
pubmed: 15296038
Harden RM (2001) AMEE Guide No. 21: Curriculum mapping: a tool for transparent and authentic teaching and learning AU. Med Teach 23(2):123–137
doi: 10.1080/01421590120036547
pubmed: 11371288
Cook DA, Bordage G, Schmidt HG (2008) Description, justification and clarification: a framework for classifying the purposes of research in medical education. Med Educ 42(2):128–133
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02974.x
pubmed: 18194162
Morrison J (2003) ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: evaluation. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 326(7385):385–387
doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7385.385
Thomas PA, Kern DE, Hughes MT, Chen BY (2016) Curriculum development for medical education : a six-step approach. Springer Publishing Company, Baltimore
Freeth DH, Hammick M, Reeves S, Koppel I, Barr H (2005) In: Barr H (ed) Effective interprofessional education: development, delivery, and evaluation. Blackwell Wiley, Oxford
doi: 10.1002/9780470776438
Reeves S, Pelone F, Harrison R, Goldman J, Zwarenstein M (2017) Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:Cd000072
pubmed: 28639262
Reeves S, Fletcher S, Barr H, Birch I, Boet S, Davies N, McFadyen A, Rivera J, Kitto S (2016) A BEME systematic review of the effects of interprofessional education: BEME Guide No. 39. Med Teach 38(7):656–668
doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173663
pubmed: 27146438
Pehrson C, Sorensen JL, Amer-Wahlin I (2011) Evaluation and impact of cardiotocography training programmes: a systematic review. BJOG 118(8):926–935
doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03021.x
pubmed: 21658193
Thannhauser J, Russell-Mayhew S, Scott C (2010) Measures of interprofessional education and collaboration. J Interprof Care 24(4):336–349
doi: 10.3109/13561820903442903
pubmed: 20540613
Reeves S (2016) Ideas for the development of the interprofessional education and practice field: an update. J Interprof Care 30(4):405–407
doi: 10.1080/13561820.2016.1197735
pubmed: 27332499
Reeves S, Zwarenstein M, Goldman J, Barr H, Freeth D, Koppel I, Hammick M (2010) The effectiveness of interprofessional education: key findings from a new systematic review. J Interprof Care 24(3):230–241
doi: 10.3109/13561820903163405
pubmed: 20178425
Kirkpatrick DLKJL (2006) Evaluating training programs. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc., San Francisco
Barr H, Koppel I, Reeves S, Hammick M, Freeth D, Centre for the Advancement of Interprofessional Education in Primary Health and Community C (2005) Effective interprofessional education : argument, assumption & evidence, vol xxiv. Blackwell, Oxford, p 180 s
doi: 10.1002/9780470776445
Brandt B, Lutfiyya MN, King JA, Chioreso C (2014) A scoping review of interprofessional collaborative practice and education using the lens of the triple aim. J Interprof Care 28(5):393–399
doi: 10.3109/13561820.2014.906391
pubmed: 24702046
pmcid: 4162503
Daudt HM, van Mossel C, Scott SJ (2013) Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework. BMC Med Res Methodol 13:48
doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-48
pubmed: 23522333
pmcid: 3614526
Goldman J, Zwarenstein M, Bhattacharyya O, Reeves S (2009) Improving the clarity of the interprofessional field: implications for research and continuing interprofessional education. J Contin Educ Heal Prof 29(3):151–156
doi: 10.1002/chp.20028
Reeves S, Goldman J, Gilbert J, Tepper J, Silver I, Suter E, Zwarenstein M (2011) A scoping review to improve conceptual clarity of interprofessional interventions. J Interprof Care 25(3):167–174
doi: 10.3109/13561820.2010.529960
pubmed: 21182439
Suter E, Goldman J, Martimianakis T, Chatalalsingh C, DeMatteo DJ, Reeves S (2013) The use of systems and organizational theories in the interprofessional field: findings from a scoping review. J Interprof Care 27(1):57–64
doi: 10.3109/13561820.2012.739670
pubmed: 23148862
Arksey H, O’Malley L (2005) Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol 8(1):19–32
doi: 10.1080/1364557032000119616
Grant MJ, Booth A (2009) A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Inf Libr J 26(2):91–108
doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol 62(10):e1–e34
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006
pubmed: 19631507
Adams RJ, Smart P, Huff AS (2017) Shades of grey: guidelines for working with the grey literature in systematic reviews for management and organizational studies. Int J Manag Rev 19(4):432–454
doi: 10.1111/ijmr.12102
Hematology/Oncology ASoP (2018) Available from: http://aspho.org/ . Accessed September 2018
NOPHO NSoPHaO (2018) Available from: http://www.nopho.org/welcome/frame.htm . Accessed September 2018
NOBOS NSoPON (2018) Available from: http://nobos.org . Accessed September 2018
Anderson M (2018) Available from: https://www.mdanderson.org/education-training.html . Accessed September 2018
Judes S (2018) Available from: https://www.stjude.org/ . Accessed September 2018
Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A (2016) Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 5(1):210
doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
pubmed: 27919275
pmcid: 5139140
Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK (2010) Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci 5:69
doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-69
pubmed: 20854677
pmcid: 2954944
Sands SA, Stanley P, Charon R (2008) Pediatric narrative oncology: interprofessional training to promote empathy, build teams, and prevent burnout. J Support Oncol 6(7):307–312
pubmed: 18847073
Zernikow B, Hasan C, Hechler T, Huebner B, Gordon D, Michel E (2008) Stop the pain! A nation-wide quality improvement programme in paediatric oncology pain control. Eur J Pain 12(7):819–833
doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2007.12.002
pubmed: 18222100
Treadwell MJ, Franck LS, Vichinsky E (2002) Using quality improvement strategies to enhance pediatric pain assessment. Int J Qual Health Care 14(1):39–47
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/14.1.39
pubmed: 11871628
Moody K, Kramer D, Santizo RO, Magro L, Wyshogrod D, Ambrosio J et al (2013) Helping the helpers: mindfulness training for burnout in pediatric oncology--a pilot program. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 30(5):275–284
doi: 10.1177/1043454213504497
pubmed: 24101747
Finley GA, Forgeron P, Arnaout M (2008) Action research: developing a pediatric cancer pain program in Jordan. J Pain Symptom Manag 35(4):447–454
doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.05.006
Bouri M, Papadatou D, Koukoutsakis P, Bitsakou P, Kafetzis D (2017) The impact of pediatric palliative care training on the death attitudes of. Health Profession Int J Caring Sci 10(2):676–689
Di Giulio P, Arnfield A, English MW, Fitzgerald E, Kelly D, Jankovic M et al (2013) Collaboration between doctors and nurses in children’s cancer care: insights from a European project. Eur J Oncol Nurs 17(6):745–749
doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2013.01.003
pubmed: 23462303
Neyrinck M, Vrielink H (2015) Apheresis training for nurses and physicians around the world. J Clin Apher 30(1):32–37
doi: 10.1002/jca.21345
pubmed: 25044617
Dobrasz G, Hatfield M, Jones LM, Berdis JJ, Miller EE, Entrekin MS (2013) Nurse-driven protocols for febrile pediatric oncology patients. J Emerg Nurs 39(3):289–295
doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2013.01.014
pubmed: 23566740
Harden RM (1986) Ten questions to ask when planning a course or curriculum. Med Educ 20(4):356–365
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1986.tb01379.x
pubmed: 3747885
Nancarrow SA, Booth A, Ariss S, Smith T, Enderby P, Roots A (2013) Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work. Hum Resour Health 11:19
doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-11-19
pubmed: 23663329
pmcid: 3662612
Reeves S, Xyrichis A, Zwarenstein M (2018) Teamwork, collaboration, coordination, and networking: why we need to distinguish between different types of interprofessional practice. J Interprof Care 32(1):1–3
doi: 10.1080/13561820.2017.1400150
pubmed: 29131697
Reeves S, Boet S, Zierler B, Kitto S (2015) Interprofessional education and practice guide no. 3: evaluating interprofessional education. J Interprof Care 29(4):305–312
doi: 10.3109/13561820.2014.1003637
pubmed: 25671416
Hean S, Green C, Anderson E, Morris D, John C, Pitt R & O’Halloran C (2018) The contribution of theory to the design, delivery, and evaluation of interprofessional curricula: BEME guide no. 49. Med Teach 4(6):542–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1432851
Moreau KA (2017) Has the new Kirkpatrick generation built a better hammer for our evaluation toolbox? Med Teach 39(9):999–1001
pubmed: 28649887
Deniz E (2002) Approaches to evaluation of training: theory & practice. J Educ Technol Soc 5(2):93–98
Tamkin P, Yarnall J, Kerrin M (2002) Kirkpatrick and beyond: a review of training evaluation, IES report 392. Institute for Employment Studies, Brighton
Bates R (2004) A critical analysis of evaluation practice: the Kirkpatrick model and the principle of beneficence. Eval Program Plann 27:341–347
doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2004.04.011
Reeves S, Fletcher S, McLoughlin C, Yim A, Patel KD (2017) Interprofessional online learning for primary healthcare: findings from a scoping review. BMJ Open 7(8):e016872
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016872
pubmed: 28780560
pmcid: 5623444
Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L (2006) Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. Jama. 296(9):1094–1102
doi: 10.1001/jama.296.9.1094
pubmed: 16954489
Cook DA, West CP (2013) Perspective: reconsidering the focus on “outcomes research” in medical education: a cautionary note. Acad Med 88(2):162–167
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31827c3d78
pubmed: 23269304
Centellas KM, Smardon RE, Fifield S (2013) Calibrating translational cancer research: collaboration without consensus in interdisciplinary laboratory meetings. Sci Technol Hum Values 39(3):311–335
doi: 10.1177/0162243913505650