Development of a highly efficient Axiom™ 70 K SNP array for Pyrus and evaluation for high-density mapping and germplasm characterization.
Breeding
Genetic diversity
Genotyping
Germplasm
Pyrus
Single nucleotide polymorphism
Journal
BMC genomics
ISSN: 1471-2164
Titre abrégé: BMC Genomics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100965258
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 May 2019
02 May 2019
Historique:
received:
10
10
2018
accepted:
17
04
2019
entrez:
4
5
2019
pubmed:
3
5
2019
medline:
7
9
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Both a source of diversity and the development of genomic tools, such as reference genomes and molecular markers, are equally important to enable faster progress in plant breeding. Pear (Pyrus spp.) lags far behind other fruit and nut crops in terms of employment of available genetic resources for new cultivar development. To address this gap, we designed a high-density, high-efficiency and robust single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array for pear, with the main objectives of conducting genetic diversity and genome-wide association studies. By applying a two-step design process, which consisted of the construction of a first 'draft' array for the screening of a small subset of samples, we were able to identify the most robust and informative SNPs to include in the Applied Biosystems™ Axiom™ Pear 70 K Genotyping Array, currently the densest SNP array for pear. Preliminary evaluation of this 70 K array in 1416 diverse pear accessions from the USDA National Clonal Germplasm Repository (NCGR) in Corvallis, OR identified 66,616 SNPs (93% of all the tiled SNPs) as high quality and polymorphic (PolyHighResolution). We further used the Axiom Pear 70 K Genotyping Array to construct high-density linkage maps in a bi-parental population, and to make a direct comparison with available genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) data, which suggested that the SNP array is a more robust method of screening for SNPs than restriction enzyme reduced representation sequence-based genotyping. The Axiom Pear 70 K Genotyping Array, with its high efficiency in a widely diverse panel of Pyrus species and cultivars, represents a valuable resource for a multitude of molecular studies in pear. The characterization of the USDA-NCGR collection with this array will provide important information for pear geneticists and breeders, as well as for the optimization of conservation strategies for Pyrus.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Both a source of diversity and the development of genomic tools, such as reference genomes and molecular markers, are equally important to enable faster progress in plant breeding. Pear (Pyrus spp.) lags far behind other fruit and nut crops in terms of employment of available genetic resources for new cultivar development. To address this gap, we designed a high-density, high-efficiency and robust single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array for pear, with the main objectives of conducting genetic diversity and genome-wide association studies.
RESULTS
RESULTS
By applying a two-step design process, which consisted of the construction of a first 'draft' array for the screening of a small subset of samples, we were able to identify the most robust and informative SNPs to include in the Applied Biosystems™ Axiom™ Pear 70 K Genotyping Array, currently the densest SNP array for pear. Preliminary evaluation of this 70 K array in 1416 diverse pear accessions from the USDA National Clonal Germplasm Repository (NCGR) in Corvallis, OR identified 66,616 SNPs (93% of all the tiled SNPs) as high quality and polymorphic (PolyHighResolution). We further used the Axiom Pear 70 K Genotyping Array to construct high-density linkage maps in a bi-parental population, and to make a direct comparison with available genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) data, which suggested that the SNP array is a more robust method of screening for SNPs than restriction enzyme reduced representation sequence-based genotyping.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The Axiom Pear 70 K Genotyping Array, with its high efficiency in a widely diverse panel of Pyrus species and cultivars, represents a valuable resource for a multitude of molecular studies in pear. The characterization of the USDA-NCGR collection with this array will provide important information for pear geneticists and breeders, as well as for the optimization of conservation strategies for Pyrus.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31046664
doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5712-3
pii: 10.1186/s12864-019-5712-3
pmc: PMC6498479
doi:
Substances chimiques
Genetic Markers
0
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
331Références
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2002 Apr;5(2):94-100
pubmed: 11856602
Trends Biotechnol. 2005 Jan;23(1):48-55
pubmed: 15629858
Hum Mol Genet. 2006 Jun 15;15(12):1931-7
pubmed: 16644863
Bioinformatics. 2009 Aug 15;25(16):2078-9
pubmed: 19505943
Plant Cell. 2009 Aug;21(8):2194-202
pubmed: 19654263
J Anim Sci. 2010 Jan;88(1):32-46
pubmed: 19749023
PLoS One. 2009 Nov 11;4(11):e7767
pubmed: 19907642
Mol Biol Evol. 2010 Nov;27(11):2534-47
pubmed: 20558595
New Phytol. 2011 Mar;189(4):909-22
pubmed: 21182529
BMC Plant Biol. 2011 Apr 14;11:65
pubmed: 21492434
PLoS One. 2011 May 04;6(5):e19379
pubmed: 21573248
Nat Rev Genet. 2011 Jun 17;12(7):499-510
pubmed: 21681211
Theor Appl Genet. 2012 Mar;124(4):769-76
pubmed: 22075809
BMC Genomics. 2012 Jan 10;13:13
pubmed: 22233093
BMC Genomics. 2012 Jan 19;13:34
pubmed: 22260749
J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10
pubmed: 2231712
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31745
pubmed: 22363718
PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36674
pubmed: 22574211
Fly (Austin). 2012 Apr-Jun;6(2):80-92
pubmed: 22728672
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45520
pubmed: 23029069
Bioinformatics. 2012 Dec 15;28(24):3326-8
pubmed: 23060615
J Biosci. 2012 Nov;37(5):821-8
pubmed: 23107918
Genome Res. 2013 Feb;23(2):396-408
pubmed: 23149293
BMC Genomics. 2013 Jan 16;14:2
pubmed: 23324311
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 May 14;110(20):8057-62
pubmed: 23630259
PLoS One. 2013 May 17;8(5):e62137
pubmed: 23690931
PLoS One. 2013 May 21;8(5):e63939
pubmed: 23704960
BMC Genomics. 2013 Jun 12;14:393
pubmed: 23758946
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 14;8(10):e77022
pubmed: 24155917
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 03;9(4):e92644
pubmed: 24699266
New Phytol. 2014 Jul;203(2):535-53
pubmed: 24750093
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2014 Nov;80:54-65
pubmed: 25083939
J Exp Bot. 2014 Nov;65(20):5771-81
pubmed: 25129128
Nat Genet. 2014 Oct;46(10):1089-96
pubmed: 25151358
BMC Plant Biol. 2014 Sep 16;14:241
pubmed: 25224302
BMC Genomics. 2014 Sep 29;15:823
pubmed: 25266061
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 10;9(10):e110377
pubmed: 25303088
BMC Genomics. 2015 Mar 07;16:155
pubmed: 25886969
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Apr 21;6:249
pubmed: 25954285
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 09;10(9):e0136803
pubmed: 26352671
BMC Plant Biol. 2015 Sep 22;15:230
pubmed: 26394845
Plant J. 2015 Dec;84(6):1257-73
pubmed: 26590015
BMC Genomics. 2016 Feb 20;17:124
pubmed: 26897486
Plant J. 2016 Apr;86(1):62-74
pubmed: 26919684
Mol Ecol Resour. 2016 Jul;16(4):1023-36
pubmed: 26929265
J Exp Bot. 2016 Apr;67(9):2875-88
pubmed: 27034326
DNA Res. 2017 Jun 1;24(3):289-301
pubmed: 28130382
Hortic Res. 2017 Apr 12;4:17015
pubmed: 28451438
Plant Biotechnol J. 2018 Apr;16(4):890-901
pubmed: 28913885
Genome Biol. 2018 Jun 11;19(1):77
pubmed: 29890997
Genetics. 1994 Aug;137(4):1121-37
pubmed: 7982566