The safety and efficacy of Guluronic acid (G2013) in ankylosing spondylitis: A randomized controlled parallel clinical trial.


Journal

Pharmacological reports : PR
ISSN: 2299-5684
Titre abrégé: Pharmacol Rep
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101234999

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Historique:
received: 18 08 2018
revised: 26 12 2018
accepted: 04 02 2019
pubmed: 20 4 2019
medline: 21 11 2019
entrez: 20 4 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To assess the therapeutic efficacy, safety and tolerability of Guluronic acid (G2013) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients. This investigation was a 12-week randomized, placebo-controlled, phase I/II clinical trial involving 75 AS patients that were randomly divided into 3 groups: 25 as placebo, 25 Guluronic acid and 25 naproxen groups. Patients who had AS with active disease at baseline according to the modified New York criteria were considered for this trial. The primary consequence measure was the Appraisement of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 20 response-rate at week 12. There were no statistically significant differences between groups at the entry. ASAS20 response at week 12 was achieved (60.8%) in patients receiving Guluronic acid compared with - (68.4% of) - patients in the naproxen group (p > 0.05) and (21.0%) of patients in the placebo group. In comparison with the placebo group from the baseline to week 12, patients who received Guluronic acid and naproxen showed significantly greater improvement in all secondary endpoints. Moreover, Guluronic acid decreased some inflammatory parameters more dramatically than naproxen and placebo group. Patients in the naproxen group had more incidence of gastrointestinal and others adverse events in comparison with Guluronic acid and placebo groups. The present research indicated that Guluronic acid and naproxen are similar in terms of efficacy. However, Guluronic acid had more notable safety characteristics identifying information than naproxen. Accordingly, it is proposed that Guluronic acid could be appropriate for management of AS. Clinical trial identifier; IRCT2016091813739N4.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
To assess the therapeutic efficacy, safety and tolerability of Guluronic acid (G2013) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients.
METHODS METHODS
This investigation was a 12-week randomized, placebo-controlled, phase I/II clinical trial involving 75 AS patients that were randomly divided into 3 groups: 25 as placebo, 25 Guluronic acid and 25 naproxen groups. Patients who had AS with active disease at baseline according to the modified New York criteria were considered for this trial. The primary consequence measure was the Appraisement of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) 20 response-rate at week 12.
RESULTS RESULTS
There were no statistically significant differences between groups at the entry. ASAS20 response at week 12 was achieved (60.8%) in patients receiving Guluronic acid compared with - (68.4% of) - patients in the naproxen group (p > 0.05) and (21.0%) of patients in the placebo group. In comparison with the placebo group from the baseline to week 12, patients who received Guluronic acid and naproxen showed significantly greater improvement in all secondary endpoints. Moreover, Guluronic acid decreased some inflammatory parameters more dramatically than naproxen and placebo group. Patients in the naproxen group had more incidence of gastrointestinal and others adverse events in comparison with Guluronic acid and placebo groups.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
The present research indicated that Guluronic acid and naproxen are similar in terms of efficacy. However, Guluronic acid had more notable safety characteristics identifying information than naproxen. Accordingly, it is proposed that Guluronic acid could be appropriate for management of AS. Clinical trial identifier; IRCT2016091813739N4.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31003148
pii: S1734-1140(18)30482-1
doi: 10.1016/j.pharep.2019.02.002
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal 0
Hexuronic Acids 0
guluronic acid 15769-56-9
Naproxen 57Y76R9ATQ

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase I Clinical Trial, Phase II Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

393-398

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Auteurs

Sepideh Nazeri (S)

Department of Immunology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Ahmad Reza Jamshidi (AR)

Rheumatology Research Center, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Electronic address: jamshida@sina.tums.ac.ir.

Mahdi Mahmoudi (M)

Rheumatology Research Center, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Mahdi Vojdanian (M)

Rheumatology Research Center, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Shahin Khadem Azarian (S)

Department of Immunology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Sanaz Afraei (S)

Department of Immunology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Shayan Mostafaei (S)

Rheumatology Research Center, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.

Mostafa Hosseini (M)

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Abbas Mirshafiey (A)

Department of Immunology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Electronic address: mirshafiey@tums.ac.ir.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH