Compliance and patient reported toxicity from oral adjuvant bisphosphonates in patients with early breast cancer. A cross sectional study.
Adjuvant bisphosphonates
Early breast cancer
Toxicity
Journal
Journal of bone oncology
ISSN: 2212-1366
Titre abrégé: J Bone Oncol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101610292
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
14
01
2019
revised:
14
02
2019
accepted:
15
02
2019
entrez:
3
4
2019
pubmed:
3
4
2019
medline:
3
4
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Adjuvant bisphosphonates (BPs) are recommended as part of routine early breast cancer treatment for many postmenopausal (PM) women within the past year. There is a paucity of 'real world' data on compliance and patient satisfaction with oral BPs in this population. The aim of our study was to investigate patient reported compliance and toxicity of these drugs in a retrospective cohort study. 413 patient were identified as receiving adjuvant oral BPs as part of their breast cancer treatment in the past 12 months from five NHS hospitals. The validated Osteoporosis Patient Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q) was sent to all suitable patients ( 295 (76%) of patients responded. Average age was median (range) 67 (35-89). The majority of patients had T1 (52%), N0 (61%) grade 2 (58%) ER positive (87%), HER2 negative (84%) breast cancer and were PM at diagnosis of breast cancer (93%). All patients had been prescribed at least 1 month of oral ibandronate 50 mg daily. Review of items rated on the 7-point scale (1 = very dissatisfied to 7 = very satisfied), the mean item scores ranged from 5.0 (lowest) for time required to take oral BPs, to 6.1 (highest) for how easy it is to remember to take the medication. <10% of patients were extremely bothered by heartburn or stomach upset. 16% of responders stopped oral BPs with 10% of those converting onto IV BPs. Prevalence of severe side effects in a 'real world' population of PM women receiving adjuvant BPs is low and these drugs are generally well accepted and tolerated by patients.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Adjuvant bisphosphonates (BPs) are recommended as part of routine early breast cancer treatment for many postmenopausal (PM) women within the past year. There is a paucity of 'real world' data on compliance and patient satisfaction with oral BPs in this population. The aim of our study was to investigate patient reported compliance and toxicity of these drugs in a retrospective cohort study.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
METHODS
413 patient were identified as receiving adjuvant oral BPs as part of their breast cancer treatment in the past 12 months from five NHS hospitals. The validated Osteoporosis Patient Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (OPSAT-Q) was sent to all suitable patients (
RESULTS
RESULTS
295 (76%) of patients responded. Average age was median (range) 67 (35-89). The majority of patients had T1 (52%), N0 (61%) grade 2 (58%) ER positive (87%), HER2 negative (84%) breast cancer and were PM at diagnosis of breast cancer (93%). All patients had been prescribed at least 1 month of oral ibandronate 50 mg daily. Review of items rated on the 7-point scale (1 = very dissatisfied to 7 = very satisfied), the mean item scores ranged from 5.0 (lowest) for time required to take oral BPs, to 6.1 (highest) for how easy it is to remember to take the medication. <10% of patients were extremely bothered by heartburn or stomach upset. 16% of responders stopped oral BPs with 10% of those converting onto IV BPs.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Prevalence of severe side effects in a 'real world' population of PM women receiving adjuvant BPs is low and these drugs are generally well accepted and tolerated by patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30937280
doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2019.100226
pii: S2212-1374(19)30004-1
pii: 100226
pmc: PMC6429539
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100226Références
J Intern Med. 1999 Jul;246(1):67-74
pubmed: 10447227
Semin Oncol. 2001 Aug;28(4 Suppl 11):2-8
pubmed: 11544569
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Aug 1;20(15):3219-24
pubmed: 12149294
Nat Rev Cancer. 2002 Aug;2(8):584-93
pubmed: 12154351
Br J Cancer. 2004 Mar 22;90(6):1133-7
pubmed: 15026791
Oncologist. 2004;9 Suppl 4:28-37
pubmed: 15459427
Acta Oncol. 2004;43(7):650-6
pubmed: 15545185
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Jul 11;4:42
pubmed: 16834773
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Feb 21;99(4):322-30
pubmed: 17312309
Cancer Treat Rev. 2008 Aug;34(5):453-75
pubmed: 18423992
Breast. 2008 Oct;17(5):459-63
pubmed: 18455921
N Engl J Med. 2009 Feb 12;360(7):679-91
pubmed: 19213681
Psychooncology. 2011 Jul;20(7):755-61
pubmed: 20878871
N Engl J Med. 2011 Oct 13;365(15):1396-405
pubmed: 21995387
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jul;13(7):734-42
pubmed: 22704583
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2013 Jul;139(7):1149-55
pubmed: 23552873
Int Arch Med. 2013 May 24;6(1):24
pubmed: 23705998
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Oct 1;31(28):3531-9
pubmed: 23980081
Calcif Tissue Int. 2015 Dec;97(6):535-41
pubmed: 26202819
Lancet. 2015 Oct 3;386(10001):1353-1361
pubmed: 26211824
Ann Oncol. 2016 Mar;27(3):379-90
pubmed: 26681681
Bone Rep. 2015 Oct 30;4:5-10
pubmed: 28326336
J Bone Oncol. 2017 Mar 23;7:1-12
pubmed: 28413771
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 20;35(18):2062-2081
pubmed: 28618241
J Clin Oncol. 1993 Jan;11(1):59-65
pubmed: 8418243
N Engl J Med. 1998 Aug 6;339(6):357-63
pubmed: 9691101