Saving Mothers, Giving Life: It Takes a System to Save a Mother (Republication).
Journal
Global health, science and practice
ISSN: 2169-575X
Titre abrégé: Glob Health Sci Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101624414
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 03 2019
22 03 2019
Historique:
received:
31
10
2018
accepted:
11
12
2018
entrez:
31
3
2019
pubmed:
31
3
2019
medline:
31
3
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Ending preventable maternal and newborn deaths remains a global health imperative under United Nations Sustainable Development Goal targets 3.1 and 3.2. Saving Mothers, Giving Life (SMGL) was designed in 2011 within the Global Health Initiative as a public-private partnership between the U.S. government, Merck for Mothers, Every Mother Counts, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the government of Norway, and Project C.U.R.E. SMGL's initial aim was to dramatically reduce maternal mortality in low-resource, high-burden sub-Saharan African countries. SMGL used a district health systems strengthening approach combining both supply- and demand-side interventions to address the 3 key delays to accessing effective maternity care in a timely manner: delays in seeking, reaching, and receiving quality obstetric services. The SMGL approach was piloted from June 2012 to December 2013 in 8 rural districts (4 each) in Uganda and Zambia with high levels of maternal deaths. Over the next 4 years, SMGL expanded to a total of 13 districts in Uganda and 18 in Zambia. SMGL built on existing host government and private maternal and child health platforms, and was aligned with and guided by Ugandan and Zambian maternal and newborn health policies and programs. A 35% reduction in the maternal mortality ratio (MMR) was achieved in SMGL-designated facilities in both countries during the first 12 months of implementation. Maternal health outcomes achieved after 5 years of implementation in the SMGL-designated pilot districts were substantial: a 44% reduction in both facility and districtwide MMR in Uganda, and a 38% decrease in facility and a 41% decline in districtwide MMR in Zambia. Facility deliveries increased by 47% (from 46% to 67%) in Uganda and by 44% (from 62% to 90%) in Zambia. Cesarean delivery rates also increased: by 71% in Uganda (from 5.3% to 9.0%) and by 79% in Zambia (from 2.7% to 4.8%). The average annual rate of reduction for maternal deaths in the SMGL-supported districts exceeded that found countrywide: 11.5% versus 3.5% in Uganda and 10.5% versus 2.8% in Zambia. The changes in stillbirth rates were significant (-13% in Uganda and -36% in Zambia) but those for pre-discharge neonatal mortality rates were not significant in either Uganda or Zambia. A district health systems strengthening approach to addressing the 3 delays to accessing timely, appropriate, high-quality care for pregnant women can save women's lives from preventable causes and reduce stillbirths. The approach appears not to significantly impact pre-discharge neonatal mortality.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Ending preventable maternal and newborn deaths remains a global health imperative under United Nations Sustainable Development Goal targets 3.1 and 3.2. Saving Mothers, Giving Life (SMGL) was designed in 2011 within the Global Health Initiative as a public-private partnership between the U.S. government, Merck for Mothers, Every Mother Counts, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the government of Norway, and Project C.U.R.E. SMGL's initial aim was to dramatically reduce maternal mortality in low-resource, high-burden sub-Saharan African countries. SMGL used a district health systems strengthening approach combining both supply- and demand-side interventions to address the 3 key delays to accessing effective maternity care in a timely manner: delays in seeking, reaching, and receiving quality obstetric services.
IMPLEMENTATION
The SMGL approach was piloted from June 2012 to December 2013 in 8 rural districts (4 each) in Uganda and Zambia with high levels of maternal deaths. Over the next 4 years, SMGL expanded to a total of 13 districts in Uganda and 18 in Zambia. SMGL built on existing host government and private maternal and child health platforms, and was aligned with and guided by Ugandan and Zambian maternal and newborn health policies and programs. A 35% reduction in the maternal mortality ratio (MMR) was achieved in SMGL-designated facilities in both countries during the first 12 months of implementation.
RESULTS
Maternal health outcomes achieved after 5 years of implementation in the SMGL-designated pilot districts were substantial: a 44% reduction in both facility and districtwide MMR in Uganda, and a 38% decrease in facility and a 41% decline in districtwide MMR in Zambia. Facility deliveries increased by 47% (from 46% to 67%) in Uganda and by 44% (from 62% to 90%) in Zambia. Cesarean delivery rates also increased: by 71% in Uganda (from 5.3% to 9.0%) and by 79% in Zambia (from 2.7% to 4.8%). The average annual rate of reduction for maternal deaths in the SMGL-supported districts exceeded that found countrywide: 11.5% versus 3.5% in Uganda and 10.5% versus 2.8% in Zambia. The changes in stillbirth rates were significant (-13% in Uganda and -36% in Zambia) but those for pre-discharge neonatal mortality rates were not significant in either Uganda or Zambia.
CONCLUSION
A district health systems strengthening approach to addressing the 3 delays to accessing timely, appropriate, high-quality care for pregnant women can save women's lives from preventable causes and reduce stillbirths. The approach appears not to significantly impact pre-discharge neonatal mortality.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30926736
pii: GHSP-D-19-00092
doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00092
pmc: PMC6538123
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Corrected and Republished Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
20-40Commentaires et corrections
Type : RepublishedFrom
Informations de copyright
© Conlon et al.
Références
Lancet. 2006 Oct 7;368(9543):1284-99
pubmed: 17027735
Am J Public Health. 2007 May;97(5):796-803
pubmed: 17395848
Matern Child Health J. 2008 Jul;12(4):519-24
pubmed: 17713849
Trop Med Int Health. 2010 Aug;15(8):964-72
pubmed: 20636527
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52090
pubmed: 23284882
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S11
pubmed: 23819798
Int Health. 2013 Sep;5(3):180-95
pubmed: 24030269
Lancet. 2014 Jul 26;384(9940):347-70
pubmed: 24853604
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jun;33(6):1058-66
pubmed: 24889956
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jul 22;14:243
pubmed: 25052536
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2013 Mar 21;1(1):117-33
pubmed: 25276522
Ethiop J Health Sci. 2014 Sep;24 Suppl:137-48
pubmed: 25489188
Reprod Health. 2015 May 6;12 Suppl 1:S1
pubmed: 26000733
Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Jul;3(7):e387-95
pubmed: 26004775
Reprod Health. 2015 Jun 17;12:56
pubmed: 26081494
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Apr;31(3):293-301
pubmed: 26135364
Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387(10017):462-74
pubmed: 26584737
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Nov;31(9):1262-9
pubmed: 27255213
Reprod Health. 2016 Aug 20;13(1):95
pubmed: 27543121
J Int AIDS Soc. 2016 Oct 19;19(1):20619
pubmed: 27765142
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jan 19;17(1):42
pubmed: 28103836
Glob Health Action. 2017 Aug;10(sup4):1346925
pubmed: 28849723
Reprod Health. 2017 Aug 29;14(1):105
pubmed: 28851383
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2019 Mar 13;7(Suppl 1):S27-S47
pubmed: 30867208
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2019 Mar 13;7(Suppl 1):S48-S67
pubmed: 30867209
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2019 Mar 13;7(Suppl 1):S68-S84
pubmed: 30867210
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2019 Mar 13;7(Suppl 1):S85-S103
pubmed: 30867211
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2019 Mar 13;7(Suppl 1):S104-S122
pubmed: 30867212
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2019 Mar 13;7(Suppl 1):S123-S138
pubmed: 30867213
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2019 Mar 13;7(Suppl 1):S139-S150
pubmed: 30867214
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2019 Mar 13;7(Suppl 1):S151-S167
pubmed: 30867215
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2019 Mar 13;7(Suppl 1):S168-S187
pubmed: 30867216
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2019 Mar 13;7(Suppl 1):S188-S206
pubmed: 30867217
Soc Sci Med. 1994 Apr;38(8):1091-110
pubmed: 8042057