Efficacy of reciprocating systems for removing root filling material plus complementary cleaning methods in flattened canals: Microtomography and scanning electron microscopy study.
Reciproc Blue
XP-endo Shaper
micro-CT
retreatment
scanning electron microscope
Journal
Microscopy research and technique
ISSN: 1097-0029
Titre abrégé: Microsc Res Tech
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9203012
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2019
Jul 2019
Historique:
received:
07
11
2018
revised:
24
02
2019
accepted:
26
02
2019
pubmed:
20
3
2019
medline:
13
11
2019
entrez:
20
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to evaluate three reciprocating systems and complementary cleaning methods on filling material removal during retreatment of flattened canals. Thirty-six mandibular incisors were prepared using rotary instruments up to size 25.08 and filled using the single-cone technique. Subsequently, the teeth were divided into three groups (n = 12) according to retreatment procedures: Reciproc Blue (RB): 25/0.08 and 40/0.06; ProDesign R (PDR): 25/0.06 and 35/0.05; and WaveOne Gold (WOG): 25/0.07 and 35/0.06. The remaining filling volume materials were assessed by means of micro-CT imaging before and after retreatment. After this, the specimens were subdivided into three groups according to complementary cleaning methods: XP-Endo Shaper (30/0.01); passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI); 60° oscillatory instrumentation with #30 H-file, and micro-CT scan was taken. Then, the roots were cut in half and the samples were analyzed by scanning electron microscope (SEM). The data were analyzed statistically using Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's Multiple Comparison test with significance level of 5%. None of the reciprocating files promoted complete removal of filling material and there was no statistical difference between the groups, regardless instrument size (p > 0.05). Complementary cleaning methods increased remnant filling removal (p < 0.05). XP-endo Shaper significantly reduced the amount of filling material in the apical and middle thirds, compared with H-files (p < 0.05), with no difference with PUI. In the SEM, there was no statistical difference among the instruments (p > 0.05). The reciprocating systems showed similar effectiveness in removing root filling material. Complementary cleaning method with the XP-Shaper enhanced filling material removal.
Substances chimiques
Root Canal Filling Materials
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1057-1064Subventions
Organisme : FAPESP
ID : 2015/03829-1
Informations de copyright
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.