Bone marrow stimulation decreases retear rates after primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bone marrow stimulation microfracture multiple channeling rotator cuff rotator cuff repair rotator cuff tear

Journal

Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
ISSN: 1532-6500
Titre abrégé: J Shoulder Elbow Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9206499

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Historique:
received: 01 08 2018
revised: 31 10 2018
accepted: 09 11 2018
entrez: 20 3 2019
pubmed: 20 3 2019
medline: 8 5 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Despite the optimization of biomechanical and patient factors in the setting of rotator cuff repair (RCR), postoperative retear rates remain high in many series reported in the literature. Preclinical studies have suggested bone marrow stimulation (BMS) at the rotator cuff footprint may reduce the rate of retear after RCR. The objective of this meta-analysis was to analyze the clinical evidence investigating the effect of arthroscopic RCR, with and without BMS, on rotator cuff healing and functional outcomes. PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched through December 2017. Two reviewers selected studies based on the inclusion criteria and assessed methodologic quality. Pooled analyses were performed for continuous and binomial variables where appropriate. Four studies (365 patients), including 2 Level I randomized controlled trials and 2 Level III retrospective comparative cohort studies were included. There was no statistical difference in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale score, or the Constant score between the BMS and conventional repair groups. The pooled retear rates were 18.4% (28 of 152) and 31.8% (56 of 176) for patients treated with and without BMS, respectively. The pooled analysis of rotator cuff retear rates from the 4 studies (328 patients) showed a statistically significant difference favoring BMS over conventional repair (odds ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.73; P = .002; I BMS reduces the retear rate after RCR but shows no difference in functional outcomes compared with conventional repair. This study provides evidence for the use of BMS as a potential cost-effective biological approach toward improving rotator cuff healing.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Despite the optimization of biomechanical and patient factors in the setting of rotator cuff repair (RCR), postoperative retear rates remain high in many series reported in the literature. Preclinical studies have suggested bone marrow stimulation (BMS) at the rotator cuff footprint may reduce the rate of retear after RCR. The objective of this meta-analysis was to analyze the clinical evidence investigating the effect of arthroscopic RCR, with and without BMS, on rotator cuff healing and functional outcomes.
METHODS METHODS
PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched through December 2017. Two reviewers selected studies based on the inclusion criteria and assessed methodologic quality. Pooled analyses were performed for continuous and binomial variables where appropriate.
RESULTS RESULTS
Four studies (365 patients), including 2 Level I randomized controlled trials and 2 Level III retrospective comparative cohort studies were included. There was no statistical difference in the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Rating Scale score, or the Constant score between the BMS and conventional repair groups. The pooled retear rates were 18.4% (28 of 152) and 31.8% (56 of 176) for patients treated with and without BMS, respectively. The pooled analysis of rotator cuff retear rates from the 4 studies (328 patients) showed a statistically significant difference favoring BMS over conventional repair (odds ratio, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.73; P = .002; I
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
BMS reduces the retear rate after RCR but shows no difference in functional outcomes compared with conventional repair. This study provides evidence for the use of BMS as a potential cost-effective biological approach toward improving rotator cuff healing.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30885313
pii: S1058-2746(18)30877-2
doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2018.11.049
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Meta-Analysis Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

782-791

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Prabjit Ajrawat (P)

Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (UTOSM), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Tim Dwyer (T)

Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (UTOSM), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Mahmoud Almasri (M)

Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (UTOSM), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Christian Veillette (C)

Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (UTOSM), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Anthony Romeo (A)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Timothy Leroux (T)

Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (UTOSM), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.

John Theodoropoulos (J)

Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (UTOSM), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Aaron Nauth (A)

Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (UTOSM), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Patrick Henry (P)

Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (UTOSM), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Jaskarndip Chahal (J)

Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (UTOSM), Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada. Electronic address: jchahal@utosm.com.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH