A Relative Cost of Control Analysis of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Exenatide Extended-Release and Dulaglutide for Bringing Patients to HbA1c and Weight Loss Treatment Targets in the USA.
Body Weight
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
/ drug therapy
Drug Administration Schedule
Exenatide
/ economics
Female
Glucagon-Like Peptides
/ analogs & derivatives
Glycated Hemoglobin
/ metabolism
Humans
Hypoglycemic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments
/ economics
Male
Middle Aged
Recombinant Fusion Proteins
/ economics
Weight Loss
Costs and cost analysis
Diabetes mellitus
Glucagon-like peptides
Type 2
United States
Journal
Advances in therapy
ISSN: 1865-8652
Titre abrégé: Adv Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8611864
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2019
05 2019
Historique:
received:
27
11
2018
pubmed:
16
3
2019
medline:
7
5
2020
entrez:
16
3
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The SUSTAIN 3 and 7 clinical trials compared the efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide relative to exenatide extended-release (ER) and dulaglutide, respectively, in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). The trials included a series of clinically relevant single and composite endpoints focused on improving glycemic control and reducing body weight, while avoiding hypoglycemia. The present study combined SUSTAIN 3 and 7 outcomes with short-term treatment costs to evaluate the relative cost of control of once-weekly semaglutide versus exenatide ER and dulaglutide. Proportions of patients reaching three endpoints were taken from SUSTAIN 3 and 7 for comparisons with exenatide ER and dulaglutide, respectively. The endpoints investigated were HbA1c < 7.0%, HbA1c < 7.0% without hypoglycemia or weight gain, and a ≥ 1.0% HbA1c reduction with ≥ 5.0% weight loss. Annual per patient treatment costs were based on US wholesale acquisition costs from July 2018. Relative cost of control was calculated by plotting the ratio of the treatment costs and the ratio of the proportions of patients reaching each endpoint on the cost-efficacy plane. Once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg were most effective at bringing patients to each of the three endpoints across both SUSTAIN trials. The efficacy-to-cost ratios for once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg were also superior to all comparators when assessing both the single endpoint of HbA1c < 7.0% and the two composite endpoints including weight loss and hypoglycemia. The present study showed that once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg offer superior cost of control versus exenatide ER and dulaglutide in terms of achieving single and composite endpoints, based on an analysis of retrieved dropout data. Once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1.0 mg would therefore represent good value for money in the USA, particularly in the attainment of multi-model T2D treatment goals. Novo Nordisk A/S.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30875029
doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-00915-8
pii: 10.1007/s12325-019-00915-8
pmc: PMC6824375
doi:
Substances chimiques
Glycated Hemoglobin A
0
Hypoglycemic Agents
0
Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments
0
Recombinant Fusion Proteins
0
semaglutide
53AXN4NNHX
Glucagon-Like Peptides
62340-29-8
Exenatide
9P1872D4OL
dulaglutide
WTT295HSY5
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Pagination
1190-1199Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Popul Health Manag. 2009 Apr;12(2):103-10
pubmed: 19361253
Diabetes Care. 2018 Feb;41(2):258-266
pubmed: 29246950
Diabetes Ther. 2018 Jun;9(3):951-961
pubmed: 29557057
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Apr;6(4):275-286
pubmed: 29397376
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Mar;21(3):611-621
pubmed: 30362224
Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):837-53
pubmed: 9742976
Diabetes Care. 2017 Jan;40(Suppl 1):S64-S74
pubmed: 27979895
Diabetes Care. 2017 Jan;40(Suppl 1):S57-S63
pubmed: 27979894
Am Heart J. 2006 Jul;152(1):27-38
pubmed: 16824829
Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):854-65
pubmed: 9742977
Lancet. 2011 Jul 9;378(9786):156-67
pubmed: 21705063
J Manag Care Pharm. 2013 Apr;19(3):237-46
pubmed: 23537458
Diabetes Care. 2018 May;41(5):929-932
pubmed: 29678864
Lancet. 2010 Aug 7;376(9739):419-30
pubmed: 20594588
N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 7;358(6):580-91
pubmed: 18256393
Diabetes Care. 2018 May;41(5):917-928
pubmed: 29567642
N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 9;359(15):1577-89
pubmed: 18784090
Diabetes Care. 2017 Jan;40(Suppl 1):S48-S56
pubmed: 27979893
N Engl J Med. 2008 Jun 12;358(24):2560-72
pubmed: 18539916