The genetic legacy of continental scale admixture in Indian Austroasiatic speakers.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 03 2019
07 03 2019
Historique:
received:
21
05
2018
accepted:
13
02
2019
entrez:
9
3
2019
pubmed:
9
3
2019
medline:
30
9
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Surrounded by speakers of Indo-European, Dravidian and Tibeto-Burman languages, around 11 million Munda (a branch of Austroasiatic language family) speakers live in the densely populated and genetically diverse South Asia. Their genetic makeup holds components characteristic of South Asians as well as Southeast Asians. The admixture time between these components has been previously estimated on the basis of archaeology, linguistics and uniparental markers. Using genome-wide genotype data of 102 Munda speakers and contextual data from South and Southeast Asia, we retrieved admixture dates between 2000-3800 years ago for different populations of Munda. The best modern proxies for the source populations for the admixture with proportions 0.29/0.71 are Lao people from Laos and Dravidian speakers from Kerala in India. The South Asian population(s), with whom the incoming Southeast Asians intermixed, had a smaller proportion of West Eurasian genetic component than contemporary proxies. Somewhat surprisingly Malaysian Peninsular tribes rather than the geographically closer Austroasiatic languages speakers like Vietnamese and Cambodians show highest sharing of IBD segments with the Munda. In addition, we affirmed that the grouping of the Munda speakers into North and South Munda based on linguistics is in concordance with genome-wide data.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30846778
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40399-8
pii: 10.1038/s41598-019-40399-8
pmc: PMC6405872
doi:
Substances chimiques
DNA, Mitochondrial
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3818Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Références
Nature. 2010 Jul 8;466(7303):238-42
pubmed: 20531471
Genetics. 2013 Apr;193(4):1233-54
pubmed: 23410830
Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 Apr;25(4):493-498
pubmed: 28145430
Nature. 2015 Jun 11;522(7555):207-11
pubmed: 25731166
Genetics. 2012 Nov;192(3):1065-93
pubmed: 22960212
PLoS Genet. 2012 Jan;8(1):e1002453
pubmed: 22291602
Science. 2003 Apr 25;300(5619):597-603
pubmed: 12714734
Genome Res. 2009 Sep;19(9):1655-64
pubmed: 19648217
Genome Biol Evol. 2015 Apr 14;7(5):1206-15
pubmed: 25877615
Hum Biol. 2013 Feb-Jun;85(1-3):251-84
pubmed: 24297229
Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Nov;81(5):1084-97
pubmed: 17924348
Science. 2011 Sep 9;333(6048):1390-1
pubmed: 21903800
Nature. 2009 Sep 24;461(7263):489-94
pubmed: 19779445
Am J Hum Genet. 2013 Sep 5;93(3):422-38
pubmed: 23932107
Science. 2018 Jul 6;361(6397):92-95
pubmed: 29773666
Genome Biol. 2010;11(11):R113
pubmed: 21106085
Science. 2008 Feb 22;319(5866):1100-4
pubmed: 18292342
Gigascience. 2015 Feb 25;4:7
pubmed: 25722852
BMC Evol Biol. 2007 Mar 28;7:47
pubmed: 17389048
Am J Hum Genet. 2011 Dec 9;89(6):731-44
pubmed: 22152676
Hum Biol. 2011 Jun;83(3):405-35
pubmed: 21740156
Nature. 2016 Oct 13;538(7624):201-206
pubmed: 27654912
BMC Evol Biol. 2017 Mar 23;17(1):88
pubmed: 28335724
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Feb 9;113(6):1594-9
pubmed: 26811443
Nature. 2016 Oct 13;538(7624):238-242
pubmed: 27654910
Mol Biol Evol. 2012 Jan;29(1):359-65
pubmed: 21917723
Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Feb;28(2):1013-24
pubmed: 20978040
PLoS Genet. 2006 Dec;2(12):e190
pubmed: 17194218
Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Nov;24(11):1605-1611
pubmed: 27302840
PLoS Genet. 2015 Apr 21;11(4):e1005068
pubmed: 25898006
Genome Res. 2015 Apr;25(4):459-66
pubmed: 25770088
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2005 Oct;128(2):415-23
pubmed: 15795887
Sci Rep. 2015 Oct 20;5:15486
pubmed: 26482917
Nature. 2016 Aug 25;536(7617):419-24
pubmed: 27459054
Genetics. 2013 Jun;194(2):459-71
pubmed: 23535385
Nature. 2015 Sep 3;525(7567):104-8
pubmed: 26196601
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jan 21;111(3):936-41
pubmed: 24395773