A Computer Simulation Model to Analyze the Application Process for Competitive Residency Programs.


Journal

Journal of graduate medical education
ISSN: 1949-8357
Titre abrégé: J Grad Med Educ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101521733

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Historique:
received: 17 05 2018
revised: 15 10 2018
accepted: 16 10 2018
entrez: 27 2 2019
pubmed: 26 2 2019
medline: 14 6 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The residency match process for competitive specialties hinders programs' ability to holistically review applications. A computer simulation model of the residency application process was created to test the hypotheses that (1) it is advantageous to medical students to apply to the maximum number of programs under the current system, and (2) including a medical student's residency program preferences at the beginning of the application process improves the efficiency of the system for applicants and programs as quantified by the number of interview invitations received. The study was conducted in 2016 using 2014 Otolaryngology Match data. A computer model was created to perform simulations for multiple scenarios to test the hypotheses. Students were assigned scores representing We modeled a system of 99 otolaryngology residency programs with 292 residency spots and 460 student applicants. While it was individually advantageous for an applicant to apply to the maximum number of programs, this led to a poor result for the majority of students when all applicants undertook the strategy. The number of interview invitations improved for most applicants when preference was revealed. Offering applicants an option to provide program preference improves the practical number of interview invitations. This enables programs to review applicants holistically-instead of using single parameters such as United States Medical Licensing Examination scores-which facilitates a selection of applicants who will be successful in residency.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The residency match process for competitive specialties hinders programs' ability to holistically review applications.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
A computer simulation model of the residency application process was created to test the hypotheses that (1) it is advantageous to medical students to apply to the maximum number of programs under the current system, and (2) including a medical student's residency program preferences at the beginning of the application process improves the efficiency of the system for applicants and programs as quantified by the number of interview invitations received.
METHODS METHODS
The study was conducted in 2016 using 2014 Otolaryngology Match data. A computer model was created to perform simulations for multiple scenarios to test the hypotheses. Students were assigned scores representing
RESULTS RESULTS
We modeled a system of 99 otolaryngology residency programs with 292 residency spots and 460 student applicants. While it was individually advantageous for an applicant to apply to the maximum number of programs, this led to a poor result for the majority of students when all applicants undertook the strategy. The number of interview invitations improved for most applicants when preference was revealed.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Offering applicants an option to provide program preference improves the practical number of interview invitations. This enables programs to review applicants holistically-instead of using single parameters such as United States Medical Licensing Examination scores-which facilitates a selection of applicants who will be successful in residency.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30805093
doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-18-00397.1
pii: Customer: JGME-D-18-00397
pmc: PMC6375320
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

30-35

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest: The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Références

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Nov;84-A(11):2090-6
pubmed: 12429773
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Apr;202(4):649-54
pubmed: 16571437
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Dec;467(12):3340-5
pubmed: 19582529
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011 Feb;19(2):72-80
pubmed: 21292930
Urology. 2013 Oct;82(4):791-7
pubmed: 23947988
Laryngoscope. 2016 Apr;126(4):829-33
pubmed: 26228114
J Med Educ. 1986 Jul;61(7):591-5
pubmed: 3723571

Auteurs

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH