Retrospective review of insurance coverage for patch testing.
Adult
Allergens
/ administration & dosage
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact
/ diagnosis
Female
Health Expenditures
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Insurance Coverage
/ statistics & numerical data
Male
Middle Aged
Patch Tests
/ economics
Quality of Life
/ psychology
Retrospective Studies
Skin
/ drug effects
Journal
Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology
ISSN: 1534-4436
Titre abrégé: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9503580
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2019
05 2019
Historique:
received:
21
12
2018
revised:
06
02
2019
accepted:
17
02
2019
pubmed:
26
2
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
26
2
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
There is a paucity of data on the burden of insurance limitations for patients undergoing patch testing. To characterize the burden of insurance limitations and its impact on differences in management and execution of patch testing. A retrospective chart review was performed on patients with a diagnosis of contact dermatitis (International Classification of Disease [ICD], Ninth Edition, code ICD 692) who received patch testing (Current Procedural Terminology code 95044) at the George Washington Medical Faculty Associates Dermatology Clinic between January 1, 2015 and June 30, 2017. Variables including allergen limitations were compared between government-sponsored insurance and private insurance providers (eg, Insurers A, B, C, and D). A total of 371 records were identified. Government-sponsored insurance patients encountered allergen limitations more frequently than private insurance patients (86.8% vs 14.2%, P < .0001). Insurer C and D patients were least likely to encounter allergen limitations (1.2% vs 0%, P < .0001) and were tested to the most allergens (mean = 146 vs 152, P < .0001). Insurer A patients had the least allergens tested among those privately insured. Considering modification of insurance policies to allow patch testing with a larger number of allergens without restrictions is needed, with the goal of improving quality of life of these patients while saving costs from chronic use of topical corticosteroids.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
There is a paucity of data on the burden of insurance limitations for patients undergoing patch testing.
OBJECTIVE
To characterize the burden of insurance limitations and its impact on differences in management and execution of patch testing.
METHODS
A retrospective chart review was performed on patients with a diagnosis of contact dermatitis (International Classification of Disease [ICD], Ninth Edition, code ICD 692) who received patch testing (Current Procedural Terminology code 95044) at the George Washington Medical Faculty Associates Dermatology Clinic between January 1, 2015 and June 30, 2017. Variables including allergen limitations were compared between government-sponsored insurance and private insurance providers (eg, Insurers A, B, C, and D).
RESULTS
A total of 371 records were identified. Government-sponsored insurance patients encountered allergen limitations more frequently than private insurance patients (86.8% vs 14.2%, P < .0001). Insurer C and D patients were least likely to encounter allergen limitations (1.2% vs 0%, P < .0001) and were tested to the most allergens (mean = 146 vs 152, P < .0001). Insurer A patients had the least allergens tested among those privately insured.
CONCLUSION
Considering modification of insurance policies to allow patch testing with a larger number of allergens without restrictions is needed, with the goal of improving quality of life of these patients while saving costs from chronic use of topical corticosteroids.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30802503
pii: S1081-1206(19)30125-5
doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.02.012
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Allergens
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
508-512Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.