Retrospective review of insurance coverage for patch testing.


Journal

Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology
ISSN: 1534-4436
Titre abrégé: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9503580

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2019
Historique:
received: 21 12 2018
revised: 06 02 2019
accepted: 17 02 2019
pubmed: 26 2 2019
medline: 18 12 2019
entrez: 26 2 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

There is a paucity of data on the burden of insurance limitations for patients undergoing patch testing. To characterize the burden of insurance limitations and its impact on differences in management and execution of patch testing. A retrospective chart review was performed on patients with a diagnosis of contact dermatitis (International Classification of Disease [ICD], Ninth Edition, code ICD 692) who received patch testing (Current Procedural Terminology code 95044) at the George Washington Medical Faculty Associates Dermatology Clinic between January 1, 2015 and June 30, 2017. Variables including allergen limitations were compared between government-sponsored insurance and private insurance providers (eg, Insurers A, B, C, and D). A total of 371 records were identified. Government-sponsored insurance patients encountered allergen limitations more frequently than private insurance patients (86.8% vs 14.2%, P < .0001). Insurer C and D patients were least likely to encounter allergen limitations (1.2% vs 0%, P < .0001) and were tested to the most allergens (mean = 146 vs 152, P < .0001). Insurer A patients had the least allergens tested among those privately insured. Considering modification of insurance policies to allow patch testing with a larger number of allergens without restrictions is needed, with the goal of improving quality of life of these patients while saving costs from chronic use of topical corticosteroids.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
There is a paucity of data on the burden of insurance limitations for patients undergoing patch testing.
OBJECTIVE
To characterize the burden of insurance limitations and its impact on differences in management and execution of patch testing.
METHODS
A retrospective chart review was performed on patients with a diagnosis of contact dermatitis (International Classification of Disease [ICD], Ninth Edition, code ICD 692) who received patch testing (Current Procedural Terminology code 95044) at the George Washington Medical Faculty Associates Dermatology Clinic between January 1, 2015 and June 30, 2017. Variables including allergen limitations were compared between government-sponsored insurance and private insurance providers (eg, Insurers A, B, C, and D).
RESULTS
A total of 371 records were identified. Government-sponsored insurance patients encountered allergen limitations more frequently than private insurance patients (86.8% vs 14.2%, P < .0001). Insurer C and D patients were least likely to encounter allergen limitations (1.2% vs 0%, P < .0001) and were tested to the most allergens (mean = 146 vs 152, P < .0001). Insurer A patients had the least allergens tested among those privately insured.
CONCLUSION
Considering modification of insurance policies to allow patch testing with a larger number of allergens without restrictions is needed, with the goal of improving quality of life of these patients while saving costs from chronic use of topical corticosteroids.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30802503
pii: S1081-1206(19)30125-5
doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2019.02.012
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Allergens 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

508-512

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 American College of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Azam A Qureshi (AA)

University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Olabola Awosika (O)

Department of Dermatology, Henry Ford Medical System, Detroit, Michigan.

Kamaria Nelson (K)

Department of Dermatology, George Washington Medical Faculty Associates, Washington, DC.

Spencer Brodsky (S)

George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC.

Haijun Wang (H)

George Washington University, Washington, DC.

Alison Ehrlich (A)

Department of Dermatology, George Washington Medical Faculty Associates, Washington, DC; George Washington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC. Electronic address: aehrlich@mfa.gwu.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH