Spatial and habitat variation in aphid, butterfly, moth and bird phenologies over the last half century.

climate change first egg day first flight generalized additive mixed models global warming temporal trends

Journal

Global change biology
ISSN: 1365-2486
Titre abrégé: Glob Chang Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9888746

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2019
Historique:
received: 07 06 2018
revised: 18 01 2019
accepted: 31 01 2019
pubmed: 15 2 2019
medline: 11 7 2019
entrez: 15 2 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Global warming has advanced the timing of biological events, potentially leading to disruption across trophic levels. The potential importance of phenological change as a driver of population trends has been suggested. To fully understand the possible impacts, there is a need to quantify the scale of these changes spatially and according to habitat type. We studied the relationship between phenological trends, space and habitat type between 1965 and 2012 using an extensive UK dataset comprising 269 aphid, bird, butterfly and moth species. We modelled phenologies using generalized additive mixed models that included covariates for geographical (latitude, longitude, altitude), temporal (year, season) and habitat terms (woodland, scrub, grassland). Model selection showed that a baseline model with geographical and temporal components explained the variation in phenologies better than either a model in which space and time interacted or a habitat model without spatial terms. This baseline model showed strongly that phenologies shifted progressively earlier over time, that increasing altitude produced later phenologies and that a strong spatial component determined phenological timings, particularly latitude. The seasonal timing of a phenological event, in terms of whether it fell in the first or second half of the year, did not result in substantially different trends for butterflies. For moths, early season phenologies advanced more rapidly than those recorded later. Whilst temporal trends across all habitats resulted in earlier phenologies over time, agricultural habitats produced significantly later phenologies than most other habitats studied, probably because of nonclimatic drivers. A model with a significant habitat-time interaction was the best-fitting model for birds, moths and butterflies, emphasizing that the rates of phenological advance also differ among habitats for these groups. Our results suggest the presence of strong spatial gradients in mean seasonal timing and nonlinear trends towards earlier seasonal timing that varies in form and rate among habitat types.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30761691
doi: 10.1111/gcb.14592
pmc: PMC6563090
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1982-1994

Subventions

Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BBS/E/C/000J0200
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© 2019 The Authors. Global Change Biology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Références

Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Oct;22(10):3259-72
pubmed: 27173755
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 31;7:45412
pubmed: 28361883
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Dec 22;272(1581):2561-9
pubmed: 16321776
Ecol Evol. 2016 Jul 25;6(16):5907-20
pubmed: 27547364
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Jun;25(6):1982-1994
pubmed: 30761691
Nature. 2003 Jan 2;421(6918):37-42
pubmed: 12511946
Glob Chang Biol. 2016 Mar;22(3):1121-9
pubmed: 26691578
Nature. 2006 May 4;441(7089):81-3
pubmed: 16672969
J Anim Ecol. 2015 Jan;84(1):21-34
pubmed: 25123260
Science. 2018 May 18;360(6390):791-795
pubmed: 29773751
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Mar;24(3):957-971
pubmed: 29152888
Nature. 2001 Nov 1;414(6859):65-9
pubmed: 11689943
Oecologia. 2012 Mar;168(3):631-8
pubmed: 21935666
Science. 2016 Nov 11;354(6313):
pubmed: 27846577
Oecologia. 2015 Aug;178(4):1227-38
pubmed: 25822114
Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 Jun;2(6):970-975
pubmed: 29686235
Biol Lett. 2012 Aug 23;8(4):590-3
pubmed: 22491762
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Apr 22;277(1685):1281-7
pubmed: 20031988
Oecologia. 2006 Feb;147(1):164-72
pubmed: 16328547
Bull Entomol Res. 1971 Jun;60(4):533-46
pubmed: 22894860
Glob Chang Biol. 2017 Jun;23(6):2272-2283
pubmed: 28073167
Oecologia. 2010 Apr;162(4):873-84
pubmed: 20043178
Oecologia. 2011 Jan;165(1):237-48
pubmed: 20882390
Science. 2015 May 1;348(6234):571-3
pubmed: 25931559
J Anim Ecol. 2018 Jan;87(1):150-161
pubmed: 29048758
Int J Biometeorol. 2003 Aug;47(4):188-92
pubmed: 12695889
Glob Chang Biol. 2015 Sep;21(9):3313-22
pubmed: 26390228
Physiol Entomol. 2013 Jun;38(2):96-104
pubmed: 23894219
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Oct 21;105(42):16195-200
pubmed: 18849475
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jun 22;276(1665):2323-31
pubmed: 19324731
Behav Processes. 2007 May;75(1):1-7
pubmed: 17368964
Nature. 2016 Jun 29;535(7611):241-5
pubmed: 27362222

Auteurs

James R Bell (JR)

Rothamsted Insect Survey, Biointeractions and Crop Protection, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK.

Marc S Botham (MS)

Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK.

Peter A Henrys (PA)

Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster, Lancashire, UK.

David I Leech (DI)

British Trust for Ornithology, Thetford, Norfolk, UK.

James W Pearce-Higgins (JW)

British Trust for Ornithology, Thetford, Norfolk, UK.

Chris R Shortall (CR)

Rothamsted Insect Survey, Biointeractions and Crop Protection, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK.

Tom M Brereton (TM)

Butterfly Conservation, Wareham, UK.

Stephen J Thackeray (SJ)

Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster, Lancashire, UK.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH