Radiological Response Heterogeneity Is of Prognostic Significance in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-targeted Therapy.


Journal

European urology focus
ISSN: 2405-4569
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Focus
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101665661

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 09 2020
Historique:
received: 04 12 2018
revised: 07 01 2019
accepted: 16 01 2019
pubmed: 11 2 2019
medline: 21 5 2021
entrez: 11 2 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) is widely used to assess tumour response but is limited by not considering disease site or radiological heterogeneity (RH). To determine whether RH or disease site has prognostic significance in patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). A retrospective analysis was conducted of a second-line phase II study in patients with metastatic ccRCC (NCT00942877), evaluating 138 patients with 458 baseline lesions. The phase II trial assessed vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy±Src inhibition. RH at week 8 was assessed within individual patients with two or more lesions to predict overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model. We defined a high heterogeneous response as occurring when one or more lesion underwent a ≥10% reduction and one or more lesion underwent a ≥10% increase in size. Disease progression was defined by RECIST 1.1 criteria. In patients with a complete/partial response or stable disease by RECIST 1.1 and two or more lesions at week 8, those with a high heterogeneous response had a shorter OS compared to those with a homogeneous response (hazard ratio [HR] 2.01; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.39-2.92; p<0.001). Response by disease site at week 8 did not affect OS. At disease progression, one or more new lesion was associated with worse survival compared with >20% increase in sum of target lesion diameters only (HR 2.12; 95% CI: 1.43-3.14; p<0.001). Limitations include retrospective study design. RH and the development of new lesions may predict survival in metastatic ccRCC. Further prospective studies are required. We looked at individual metastases in patients with kidney cancer and showed that a variable response to treatment and the appearance of new metastases may be associated with worse survival. Further studies are required to confirm these findings.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST) is widely used to assess tumour response but is limited by not considering disease site or radiological heterogeneity (RH).
OBJECTIVE
To determine whether RH or disease site has prognostic significance in patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC).
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
A retrospective analysis was conducted of a second-line phase II study in patients with metastatic ccRCC (NCT00942877), evaluating 138 patients with 458 baseline lesions.
INTERVENTION
The phase II trial assessed vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy±Src inhibition.
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
RH at week 8 was assessed within individual patients with two or more lesions to predict overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model. We defined a high heterogeneous response as occurring when one or more lesion underwent a ≥10% reduction and one or more lesion underwent a ≥10% increase in size. Disease progression was defined by RECIST 1.1 criteria.
RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS
In patients with a complete/partial response or stable disease by RECIST 1.1 and two or more lesions at week 8, those with a high heterogeneous response had a shorter OS compared to those with a homogeneous response (hazard ratio [HR] 2.01; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.39-2.92; p<0.001). Response by disease site at week 8 did not affect OS. At disease progression, one or more new lesion was associated with worse survival compared with >20% increase in sum of target lesion diameters only (HR 2.12; 95% CI: 1.43-3.14; p<0.001). Limitations include retrospective study design.
CONCLUSIONS
RH and the development of new lesions may predict survival in metastatic ccRCC. Further prospective studies are required.
PATIENT SUMMARY
We looked at individual metastases in patients with kidney cancer and showed that a variable response to treatment and the appearance of new metastases may be associated with worse survival. Further studies are required to confirm these findings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30738795
pii: S2405-4569(19)30010-0
doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.01.010
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Benzodioxoles 0
Enzyme Inhibitors 0
Quinazolines 0
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A 0
saracatinib 9KD24QGH76
cediranib NQU9IPY4K9

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00942877']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase II Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

999-1005

Subventions

Organisme : Cancer Research UK
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Auteurs

Peter E Hall (PE)

Barts Cancer Institute, CRUK Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, London, UK.

Scott T C Shepherd (STC)

Department of Oncology, Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.

Janet Brown (J)

Department of Medical Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK; Academic Unit of Clinical Oncology, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

James Larkin (J)

Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.

Robert Jones (R)

Beatson Cancer Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.

Christy Ralph (C)

Department of Medical Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.

Robert Hawkins (R)

Department of Medical Oncology, Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK.

Simon Chowdhury (S)

Department of Oncology, Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Ekaterini Boleti (E)

Department of Oncology, Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Amit Bahl (A)

Department of Oncology, University Hospital Bristol NHS Foundation trust, Bristol, UK.

Kate Fife (K)

Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals, Cambridge, UK.

Andrew Webb (A)

Department of Oncology, Brighton and Sussex University Hospital Trust, Brighton, UK.

Simon J Crabb (SJ)

Cancer Sciences Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Thomas Geldart (T)

Department of Oncology, Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, UK.

Robert Hill (R)

Scottish Clinical Trials Research Unit (SCTRU), NHS National Services Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.

Joanna Dunlop (J)

Scottish Clinical Trials Research Unit (SCTRU), NHS National Services Scotland, Edinburgh, UK.

Duncan McLaren (D)

Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.

Charlotte Ackerman (C)

Barts Cancer Institute, CRUK Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, London, UK.

Akhila Wimalasingham (A)

Barts Cancer Institute, CRUK Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, London, UK.

Luis Beltran (L)

Barts Cancer Institute, CRUK Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, London, UK.

Paul Nathan (P)

Department of Oncology, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK.

Thomas Powles (T)

Barts Cancer Institute, CRUK Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, London, UK; Department of Oncology, Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. Electronic address: thomas.powles@bartshealth.nhs.uk.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH