Quitline treatment dose predicts cessation outcomes among safety net patients linked with treatment via Ask-Advise-Connect.
Ask-Advise-Connect
Electronic health record
Quitline
Smoking cessation
Telephone counseling
Tobacco
Journal
Preventive medicine reports
ISSN: 2211-3355
Titre abrégé: Prev Med Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101643766
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
24
04
2018
revised:
09
01
2019
accepted:
15
01
2019
entrez:
7
2
2019
pubmed:
7
2
2019
medline:
7
2
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The efficacy of tobacco treatment delivered by state quitlines in diverse populations is well-supported, yet little is known about associations between treatment dose and cessation outcomes following the implementation of Ask-Advise-Connect (AAC), an electronic health record-based systematic referral process that generates a high volume of proactive calls from the state quitline to smokers. The current study is a secondary analysis of a 34-month implementation trial evaluating ACC in 13 safety-net clinics in Houston, TX. Treatment was delivered by a quitline and comprised up to five proactive, telephone-delivered multi-component cognitive-behavioral treatment sessions. Associations between treatment dose and abstinence were examined. Abstinence was assessed by phone six months after treatment enrollment, and biochemically confirmed via mailed saliva cotinine. Among smokers who enrolled in treatment and agreed to follow-up (n = 3704), 29.2% completed no treatment sessions, 35.5% completed one session, 16.4% completed two sessions, and 19.0% completed ≥three sessions. Those who completed one (vs. no) sessions were no more likely to report abstinence (OR: 0.98). Those who completed two (vs. no) sessions were nearly twice as likely to report abstinence (OR: 1.83). Those who completed ≥three (vs. no) sessions were nearly four times as likely to report abstinence (OR: 3.70). Biochemically-confirmed cessation outcomes were similar. Most smokers received minimal or no treatment, and treatment dose had a large impact on abstinence. Results highlight the importance of improving engagement in evidence-based treatment protocols following enrollment. Given that motivation to quit fluctuates, systematically offering enrollment to all smokers at all visits is important.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30723660
doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.01.009
pii: S2211-3355(19)30003-8
pmc: PMC6351387
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
262-267Subventions
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : K23 DA040933
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA016672
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA225520
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : U54 GM104938
Pays : United States
Références
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Oct;72(5):797-808
pubmed: 15482038
JAMA. 2005 Jul 27;294(4):482-7
pubmed: 16046655
Tob Control. 2007 Dec;16 Suppl 1:i53-9
pubmed: 18048633
Addiction. 2008 Sep;103(9):1553-61
pubmed: 18783507
J Med Internet Res. 2008 Nov 14;10(5):e41
pubmed: 19017583
Am J Health Promot. 2009 May-Jun;23(5):328-38
pubmed: 19445436
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Feb;11(2):99-106
pubmed: 19848576
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2010 Jul-Aug;16(4):304-8
pubmed: 20520368
Nicotine Tob Res. 2011 May;13(5):319-27
pubmed: 21330267
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Jun 22;103(12):922-41
pubmed: 21666098
Am J Public Health. 2012 Mar;102(3):e8-16
pubmed: 22390525
JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Mar 25;173(6):458-64
pubmed: 23440173
Am J Public Health. 2013 Aug;103(8):e74-82
pubmed: 23763416
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 12;(8):CD002850
pubmed: 23934971
Am J Prev Med. 2013 Dec;45(6):737-41
pubmed: 24237916
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 30;6(3):e010687
pubmed: 27029775
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016 Dec;71:58-62
pubmed: 27776679
Transl Behav Med. 2018 Nov 22;:null
pubmed: 30476236
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Feb;64(1):202-11
pubmed: 8907100