Study protocol for a multi-methods study: SAVOIR - evaluation of specialized outpatient palliative care (SAPV) in Germany: outcomes, interactions, regional differences.
Ambulatory Care
/ standards
Clinical Trials as Topic
/ methods
Delivery of Health Care
/ standards
General Practice
/ standards
Germany
Humans
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Palliative Care
/ standards
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Patient Satisfaction
Prospective Studies
Quality of Health Care
Terminal Care
/ standards
Ambulatory care
Claims data
End-of-life care
General practitioner
Health service research
Mixed methods
Palliative care
Patient reported outcomes
Quality of care
Specialized outpatient palliative care
Journal
BMC palliative care
ISSN: 1472-684X
Titre abrégé: BMC Palliat Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088685
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Jan 2019
26 Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
12
09
2018
accepted:
21
01
2019
entrez:
28
1
2019
pubmed:
28
1
2019
medline:
29
5
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Since 2007, the German statutory health insurance covers Specialized Outpatient Palliative Care (SAPV). SAPV offers team-based home care for patients with advanced and progressive disease, complex symptoms and life expectancy limited to days, weeks or months. The introduction of SAPV is ruled by a directive (SAPV directive). Within this regulation, SAPV delivery models can and do differ regarding team structures, financing models, cooperation with other care professionals and processes of care. The research project SAVOIR is funded by G-BA's German Innovations Fund to evaluate the implementation of the SAPV directive. The processes, content and quality of SAPV will be evaluated from the perspectives of patients, SAPV teams, general practitioners and other care givers and payers. The influence of different contracts, team and network structures and regional and geographic settings on processes and results including patient-reported outcomes will be analyzed in five subprojects: [1] structural characteristics of SAPV and their impact on patient care, [2] quality of care from the perspective of patients, [3] quality of care from the perspective of SAPV teams, hospices, ambulatory nursing services, nursing homes and other care givers, content and extent of care from [4] the perspective of General Practitioners and [5] from the perspective of payers. The evaluation will be based on different types of data: team and organizational structures, treatment data based on routine documentation with electronic medical record systems, prospective assessment of patient-reported outcomes in a sample of SAPV teams, qualitative interviews with other stakeholders like nursing and hospice services, a survey in general practitioners and a retrospective analysis of claims data of all SAPV patients, covered by the health insurance fund BARMER in 2016. Data analysis will allow identification of variables, associated with quality of SAPV. Based on these findings, the SAVOIR study group will develop recommendations for the Federal Joint Committee for a revision of the SAPV directive. German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS): DRKS00013949 (retrospectively registered, 14.03.2018), DRKS00014726 (14.05.2018), DRKS00014730 (30.05.2018). Subproject 3 is an interview study with professional caregivers and therefore not registered in DRKS as a clinical study.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Since 2007, the German statutory health insurance covers Specialized Outpatient Palliative Care (SAPV). SAPV offers team-based home care for patients with advanced and progressive disease, complex symptoms and life expectancy limited to days, weeks or months. The introduction of SAPV is ruled by a directive (SAPV directive). Within this regulation, SAPV delivery models can and do differ regarding team structures, financing models, cooperation with other care professionals and processes of care. The research project SAVOIR is funded by G-BA's German Innovations Fund to evaluate the implementation of the SAPV directive.
METHODS
METHODS
The processes, content and quality of SAPV will be evaluated from the perspectives of patients, SAPV teams, general practitioners and other care givers and payers. The influence of different contracts, team and network structures and regional and geographic settings on processes and results including patient-reported outcomes will be analyzed in five subprojects: [1] structural characteristics of SAPV and their impact on patient care, [2] quality of care from the perspective of patients, [3] quality of care from the perspective of SAPV teams, hospices, ambulatory nursing services, nursing homes and other care givers, content and extent of care from [4] the perspective of General Practitioners and [5] from the perspective of payers. The evaluation will be based on different types of data: team and organizational structures, treatment data based on routine documentation with electronic medical record systems, prospective assessment of patient-reported outcomes in a sample of SAPV teams, qualitative interviews with other stakeholders like nursing and hospice services, a survey in general practitioners and a retrospective analysis of claims data of all SAPV patients, covered by the health insurance fund BARMER in 2016.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
Data analysis will allow identification of variables, associated with quality of SAPV. Based on these findings, the SAVOIR study group will develop recommendations for the Federal Joint Committee for a revision of the SAPV directive.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS): DRKS00013949 (retrospectively registered, 14.03.2018), DRKS00014726 (14.05.2018), DRKS00014730 (30.05.2018). Subproject 3 is an interview study with professional caregivers and therefore not registered in DRKS as a clinical study.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30684958
doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0398-5
pii: 10.1186/s12904-019-0398-5
pmc: PMC6348077
doi:
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
12Subventions
Organisme : German Innovation Fund ("Innovationsfond")
ID : 01VSF16005
Investigateurs
Anna Bauer
(A)
Lia Bergmann
(L)
Bianka Ditscheid
(B)
Cornelia Eichhorn
(C)
Antje Freytag
(A)
Elke Gaser
(E)
Michaela Hach
(M)
Ulrike Hammer
(U)
Aicko Helbig
(A)
Beata Hennig
(B)
Maximiliane Jansky
(M)
Michelle Kaufmann
(M)
Markus Krause
(M)
Sabine Krauss
(S)
Thomas Lehmann
(T)
Helmut L'hoest
(H)
Srikanth Maddela
(S)
Ursula Marschall
(U)
Martial Mboulla
(M)
Winfried Meißner
(W)
Heiner Melching
(H)
Cornelia Nageler
(C)
Friedemann Nauck
(F)
Sara Parhizkari
(S)
Judith Rothaug
(J)
Joachim Saam
(J)
Werner Schneider
(W)
Sven Schulz
(S)
Kathleen Stichling
(K)
Horst C Vollmar
(HC)
Julia von Hayek
(J)
Ulrich Wedding
(U)
Références
Palliat Med. 2000 Jan;14(1):69-74
pubmed: 10717728
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006 Jul;32(1):5-12
pubmed: 16824980
Schmerz. 2011 Apr;25(2):166, 168-173
pubmed: 21424329
Health Policy. 2013 Mar;109(3):311-8
pubmed: 22889468
Schmerz. 2013 Jun;27(3):289-95
pubmed: 23695154
Palliat Med. 2014 Jan;28(1):49-58
pubmed: 23695827
Gesundheitswesen. 2015 Feb;77(2):120-6
pubmed: 25622207
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2015;33(6):655-74
pubmed: 26315857
Palliat Med. 2016 Jun;30(6):533-48
pubmed: 26577927
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Mar 08;15:29
pubmed: 26957121
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2016 Jul 2;22(7):324-32
pubmed: 27444161
Lancet. 2017 Aug 26;390(10097):882-897
pubmed: 28684025
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2017 Dec;31:6-11
pubmed: 29173829
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2018 Apr;143(8):558-565
pubmed: 29649846
Palliat Med. 2018 Sep;32(8):1334-1343
pubmed: 29886804