A Comparison of Inpatient and Outpatient-Based Chemotherapy Regimens for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukaemia In The Elderly.
Acute Myeloid Leukaemia
non-intensive chemotherapy
outcomes
toxicity
treatment
Journal
The Ulster medical journal
ISSN: 2046-4207
Titre abrégé: Ulster Med J
Pays: Northern Ireland
ID NLM: 0417367
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Jan 2019
Historique:
accepted:
04
06
2018
entrez:
25
1
2019
pubmed:
25
1
2019
medline:
24
5
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is an aggressive haematological malignancy which is more common in the elderly and has a poor 5-year survival. There are no established beneficial interventions to treat AML in elderly patients. It is unclear whether outpatient delivery of palliative chemotherapies could reduce the burden of disease and hospitalisation for this group. To compare overall survival, response to treatment and supportive care needs between inpatient and outpatient-based treatments for AML in elderly patients. We undertook a retrospective cohort study in the Haematology Department at Belfast City Hospital comparing overall survival (OS), treatment responses and supportive care needs between inpatient and outpatient treatments for AML in elderly patients. Consecutive entrants to outpatient and inpatient based clinical trials between February 2013 and January 2017 were included. Case notes, chemotherapy charts, clinic letters, blood bank and electronic care records were analysed. OS and rates of CR (complete remission), CRi (CR with incomplete count recovery) and PR (partial response) was not significantly different between inpatient and outpatient regimens with a median OS of 201 vs. 124 days, respectively. No response was observed in 35% of patients in the inpatient group compared with 65% of the outpatient group, however this did not reach significance. Of patients who achieved CR/CRi in the outpatient group, 75% relapsed at a median of 271 days, compared with 60% of the inpatient group at a median of 209 days. At least one grade 3-4 toxicity was experienced by 90% and 83.3% of inpatient and outpatient groups, respectively. There was no difference in six common grade 3-4 toxicities. Patients on the outpatient regimen spent fewer days in hospital but had a median packed red cell use of more than twice that of the inpatient group. No difference was noted in infections, days on antibiotics or platelet use. Our data suggests that outpatient chemotherapy is safe and can reduce hospitalisation for elderly patients with AML, without a decline in OS or response rates. These results provide an important rationale to test the comparative efficacy of outpatient chemotherapy. Chemotherapy related toxicities remain a significant source of morbidity in this population and highlight the need to develop novel, targeted therapies for this age group.
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
25-29Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Provenance: externally peer-reviewed.
Références
Arch Intern Med. 2002 Jul 22;162(14):1597-603
pubmed: 12123403
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Dec 15;21(24):4642-9
pubmed: 14673054
Blood. 2005 Oct 15;106(8):2912-9
pubmed: 15994282
Cancer. 2007 Jul 15;110(2):345-52
pubmed: 17559141
Blood. 2009 Apr 30;113(18):4179-87
pubmed: 19008455
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jan 1;27(1):61-9
pubmed: 19047294
Lancet. 2010 Dec 11;376(9757):2000-8
pubmed: 21131036
Int J Clin Pharm. 2011 Apr;33(2):191-9
pubmed: 21744189
Am J Hematol. 2012 Mar;87(3):323-6
pubmed: 22213349
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011 Dec;108(51-52):863-70
pubmed: 22259641
Cancer. 2013 Aug 1;119(15):2720-7
pubmed: 23633441
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2013;11(9):571-7
pubmed: 24518520
Leukemia. 2015 Apr;29(4):770-5
pubmed: 25005246
Leuk Res. 2016 Jun;45:53-8
pubmed: 27101148
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Nov 1;23(21):6430-6440
pubmed: 28765326