Validation of the Brazilian Version of CADE-Q II to Assess Knowledge of Coronary Artery Disease Patients.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Brazil
Coronary Artery Disease
/ psychology
Cross-Cultural Comparison
Female
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Language
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Education as Topic
Psychometrics
Reference Values
Reproducibility of Results
Risk Factors
Socioeconomic Factors
Surveys and Questionnaires
/ standards
Translations
Journal
Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia
ISSN: 1678-4170
Titre abrégé: Arq Bras Cardiol
Pays: Brazil
ID NLM: 0421031
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2019
01 2019
Historique:
received:
05
04
2018
accepted:
23
07
2018
pubmed:
21
12
2018
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
21
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire (CADE-Q), an instrument aimed at assessing patients' knowledge about coronary artery disease (CAD), was originally developed and psychometrically validated in Brazil. It was later translated, cross-culturally adapted, and validated to English. Although both versions demonstrated good reliability and validity, new studies in the area have pointed out the need of implementing the CADE-Q with other components of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs, such as psychologic factors, which had not been considered in previous version and were added in the subsequent, adapted version. Thus, a second version of CADE-Q was developed in English, the CADE-Q II. to translate, culturally adapt and psychometrically validate the CADE-Q II in Brazilian Portuguese. After translation and review by a Committee of specialists in CR, a version in Brazilian Portuguese was generated and tested in 307 patients in CR. Test-retest reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) in 49 patients; internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha (α); and, criterion validity was assessed regarding patients' educational level and family income. The level of significance adopted for all tests was 5%. After the ICC analysis, 4 items were excluded. The questionnaire was considered internally consistent (α > 0.7). Associations were found between the mean total scores and the variables schooling (p < 0.001) and income (p < 0.001). Median total score was 53 (14) points corresponding to 65.4% of the total possible score. The Portuguese version of the CADE-Q II showed sufficient reliability, consistency and validity, supporting its use in future studies.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The Coronary Artery Disease Education Questionnaire (CADE-Q), an instrument aimed at assessing patients' knowledge about coronary artery disease (CAD), was originally developed and psychometrically validated in Brazil. It was later translated, cross-culturally adapted, and validated to English. Although both versions demonstrated good reliability and validity, new studies in the area have pointed out the need of implementing the CADE-Q with other components of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs, such as psychologic factors, which had not been considered in previous version and were added in the subsequent, adapted version. Thus, a second version of CADE-Q was developed in English, the CADE-Q II.
OBJECTIVE
to translate, culturally adapt and psychometrically validate the CADE-Q II in Brazilian Portuguese.
METHODS
After translation and review by a Committee of specialists in CR, a version in Brazilian Portuguese was generated and tested in 307 patients in CR. Test-retest reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) in 49 patients; internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha (α); and, criterion validity was assessed regarding patients' educational level and family income. The level of significance adopted for all tests was 5%.
RESULTS
After the ICC analysis, 4 items were excluded. The questionnaire was considered internally consistent (α > 0.7). Associations were found between the mean total scores and the variables schooling (p < 0.001) and income (p < 0.001). Median total score was 53 (14) points corresponding to 65.4% of the total possible score.
CONCLUSION
The Portuguese version of the CADE-Q II showed sufficient reliability, consistency and validity, supporting its use in future studies.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30570063
pii: S0066-782X2018005019103
doi: 10.5935/abc.20180244
pmc: PMC6317624
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Validation Study
Langues
eng
por
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
78-84Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Références
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 2;372(14):1333-41
pubmed: 25830423
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Jan 5;67(1):1-12
pubmed: 26764059
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 May;95(2):160-74
pubmed: 24529720
Lancet. 2011 Jun 4;377(9781):1949-61
pubmed: 21561658
J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Dec;46(12):1417-32
pubmed: 8263569
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014 Aug;103(2 Suppl 1):1-31
pubmed: 25387466
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Sep 03;12:E140
pubmed: 26334712
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014 Apr;102(4):364-73
pubmed: 24652054
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 May;98(5):612-21
pubmed: 25638305
J Public Health Policy. 2007;28(1):71-93
pubmed: 17363939
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013 Sep;101(3):255-62
pubmed: 23887735
J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;60(1):34-42
pubmed: 17161752
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2014 Mar;4(1):23-8
pubmed: 24534332
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Mar;98(3):378-83
pubmed: 25481574
Heart. 2016 Sep 15;102(18):1449-55
pubmed: 27181874
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2014 Nov 21;111(47):802-8
pubmed: 25487763
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2010 Jun;94(6):813-22
pubmed: 20464275
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 07;(12):CD008895
pubmed: 22161440
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Mar;99(3):443-447
pubmed: 26610390
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Apr;75(1):99-107
pubmed: 18952393
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013 Aug;20(4):701-14
pubmed: 22617117
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2008 Oct;15(5):548-56
pubmed: 18830085
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013 Apr;20(2):291-300
pubmed: 22345685