Neethling vaccine proved highly effective in controlling lumpy skin disease epidemics in the Balkans.
Balkans
Grazing
LSDV
Lumpy skin disease
Risk factors
Survival analysis
Vaccine effectiveness
Journal
Preventive veterinary medicine
ISSN: 1873-1716
Titre abrégé: Prev Vet Med
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8217463
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2020
Aug 2020
Historique:
received:
07
08
2018
accepted:
03
12
2018
pubmed:
17
12
2018
medline:
25
3
2021
entrez:
17
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Despite the wide use of the live attenuated Neethling lumpy skin disease (LSD) vaccine, only limited data existed on its efficacy and effectiveness prior to the large LSD epidemic in the Balkans, which took place during 2016-2017. In addition, analysis of risk factors for the disease was hardly performed with proper control for vaccination effects and potential differences in exposure to the virus. Data from the LSD epidemics in six Balkan countries (Bulgaria, Greece, Serbia, Montenegro, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM) and Albania) affected during 2016 were analyzed to determine vaccine effectiveness (VE) and risk factors for LSD infection at the farm level. Vaccination was performed along the occurrence of the epidemics and thus vaccination status of some of the farms changed during the epidemic. To allow for this, left truncated and right censored survival analysis was used in a mixed effects Cox proportional hazard regression model to calculate VE and risk factors for LSD. The results indicated of an average VE of 79.8% (95% CI: 73.2-84.7)) in the six countries, with the lowest VE of 62.5% documented in Albania and up to VE of more than 97% as documented in Bulgaria and Serbia. Analysis of time from vaccination to development of protective immunity showed that VE mostly developed during the first 14 days after vaccination. Data from Greece showed that the vaccination adjusted hazard ratio for LSD was 5.7 higher in grazing farms compared to non-grazing farms. However, due to a difference in geographical location of grazing and non-grazing farms and higher vaccination rate in non-grazing farms, this effect can be at least partly attributed to indirect protection due to herd immunity provided by surrounding vaccinated farms.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30553537
pii: S0167-5877(18)30537-3
doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.12.001
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Vaccines, Attenuated
0
Viral Vaccines
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
104595Subventions
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BBS/E/I/00007033
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BBS/E/I/00007036
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BBS/E/I/00007037
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.