Detection of RET rearrangements in papillary thyroid carcinoma using RT-PCR and FISH techniques - A molecular and clinical analysis.
Adult
Aged
Female
Gene Rearrangement
Humans
In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
Iodine Radioisotopes
/ metabolism
Lymph Nodes
/ pathology
Male
Middle Aged
Oncogene Fusion
/ genetics
Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf
/ genetics
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-ret
/ genetics
Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction
Thyroid Cancer, Papillary
/ genetics
Thyroid Neoplasms
/ genetics
Tumor Burden
BRAF mutation
Fluorescent in situ hybridization
Iodine avidity
Lymph node metastases
Papillary thyroid carcinoma
Prognostic factor
RET/PTC rearrangement
Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction
Journal
European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology
ISSN: 1532-2157
Titre abrégé: Eur J Surg Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8504356
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2019
06 2019
Historique:
received:
10
08
2018
revised:
22
10
2018
accepted:
12
11
2018
pubmed:
26
11
2018
medline:
15
5
2020
entrez:
26
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Oncogenic BRAF and RAS mutations as well as multiple known (and yet unknown) RET fusion oncogenes comprise the majority of causative molecular alterations in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Apparently "mutation-negative" PTCs encompass a heterogenous group impeding analysis of prognostic significance of underlying genetics. BRAF wild type PTC tissue of 56 patients was analyzed using two established methods: hybrid-specific RT-PCR for the predominant rearrangement RET/PTC1 and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Clinical features of the cases with and without RET rearrangement were compared (patient age, gender, tumor size, focality, lymph node affection, and iodine avidity). RT-PCR revealed RET/PTC1 rearrangements in five of 56 tumors (9%). FISH confirmed these, and identified four additional RET rearrangements (9/56; 16%). Loss of the iodine avidity only occurred in cases of RET/PTC hybrids (7/9 tumors), but not in RET/PTC-negative PTCs (0/41 tumors with available uptake information; p = 0.029). The risk to develop lymph node metastases was eight times higher in presence of RET rearrangements (p = 0.010). FISH analysis, in contrast to hybrid-specific RT-PCR, revealed infrequent and unknown RET fusion genes. The presence of RET rearrangements was associated with a significantly elevated risk to develop iodine refractory disease and lymph node metastases. Of note, significant clinical discrimination was only achievable when taking the FISH results into account; differences would have been missed when using the RT-PCR method only. Increasing evidence of the clinical impact of RET/PTC-positivity may influence the decision on the extent of surgical resection, especially on lymph node dissection, in PTCs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30472213
pii: S0748-7983(18)32002-X
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.11.009
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Iodine Radioisotopes
0
Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-ret
EC 2.7.10.1
RET protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
BRAF protein, human
EC 2.7.11.1
Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf
EC 2.7.11.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1018-1024Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.