Should sulfonylurea be discontinued or maintained at the lowest dose when starting ipragliflozin? A multicenter observational study in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.
Biomarkers
/ analysis
Blood Glucose
/ analysis
Body Mass Index
Body Weight
/ drug effects
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
/ drug therapy
Drug Therapy, Combination
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Glucosides
/ therapeutic use
Glycated Hemoglobin
/ analysis
Humans
Japan
Male
Middle Aged
Prognosis
Prospective Studies
Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Sulfonylurea Compounds
/ therapeutic use
Thiophenes
/ therapeutic use
Glycated hemoglobin
Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor
Sulfonylurea
Journal
Journal of diabetes investigation
ISSN: 2040-1124
Titre abrégé: J Diabetes Investig
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101520702
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
30
04
2018
revised:
03
07
2018
accepted:
09
08
2018
pubmed:
24
8
2018
medline:
10
7
2019
entrez:
24
8
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We investigated the difference in efficacy and safety between discontinuation and maintaining of sulfonylurea when adding a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor. In the present multicenter, prospective observational study, 200 patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sulfonylurea and with a need to add ipragliflozin were enrolled and divided into two groups: discontinued sulfonylurea (Discontinuation group) or maintained sulfonylurea, but at the lowest dose (Low-dose group) when adding ipragliflozin. We compared the two groups after 24 weeks using propensity score matching to adjust for differences between the groups. In the matched cohort (58 patients in each group), baseline characteristics of both groups were balanced. The primary outcome of the proportion of patients with non-exacerbation in glycated hemoglobin after 24 weeks was 91.4% in the Low-dose group and 75.9% in the Discontinuation group, a significant difference (P = 0.024). However, bodyweight was significantly decreased in the Discontinuation group compared with the Low-dose group (-4.4 ± 2.1 kg vs -2.9 ± 1.9 kg, P < 0.01). Similarly, liver enzyme improvement was more predominant in the Discontinuation group. A logistic regression analysis showed that high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, age and sulfonylurea dose were independent factors associated with non-exacerbation of glycated hemoglobin in the Discontinuation group. The purpose of using ipragliflozin should be considered when making the decision to discontinue or maintain sulfonylurea at the lowest dose. Furthermore, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, low dose of sulfonylurea and younger age were possible markers to not show worsening of glycemic control by discontinuing sulfonylurea.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30136403
doi: 10.1111/jdi.12913
pmc: PMC6400155
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Blood Glucose
0
Glucosides
0
Glycated Hemoglobin A
0
Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
0
Sulfonylurea Compounds
0
Thiophenes
0
hemoglobin A1c protein, human
0
ipragliflozin
3N2N8OOR7X
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
429-438Subventions
Organisme : Astellas Pharma,Inc.
Informations de copyright
© 2018 The Authors. Journal of Diabetes Investigation published by Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Références
J Diabetes Investig. 2019 Mar;10(2):429-438
pubmed: 30136403
Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):837-53
pubmed: 9742976
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 17;377(7):644-657
pubmed: 28605608
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2117-28
pubmed: 26378978
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2009 Sep;8(5):573-84
pubmed: 19538102
Clin Ther. 2016 Apr;38(4):843-862.e9
pubmed: 27021608
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2011;18(2):115-21
pubmed: 21071881
BMJ. 1995 Jan 14;310(6972):83-8
pubmed: 7833731
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Mar;17(3):276-84
pubmed: 25425502
Lancet. 2013 Sep 14;382(9896):941-50
pubmed: 23850055
Annu Rev Med. 2015;66:255-70
pubmed: 25341005
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1995 Aug;28 Suppl:S139-46
pubmed: 8529506
J Med Chem. 2009 Apr 9;52(7):1785-94
pubmed: 19243175
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(Suppl 1):S73-S85
pubmed: 29222379
Diabet Med. 1996 Sep;13(9 Suppl 6):S109-19
pubmed: 8894494
J Diabetes Investig. 2018 Jul;9(4):862-869
pubmed: 29032638
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2016 Oct;17(15):1995-2003
pubmed: 27477242
Intern Med. 2016;55(13):1697-703
pubmed: 27374668
Diabetes Care. 2011 Sep;34(9):2015-22
pubmed: 21816980
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011 Oct;13(10):928-38
pubmed: 21672123
Lancet. 2003 Jan 4;361(9351):85
pubmed: 12517507
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2012;8:463-72
pubmed: 23028231
Diabetes. 1995 Nov;44(11):1249-58
pubmed: 7589820
Endocr J. 2016 Jun 30;63(6):589-96
pubmed: 27052123
Lancet. 2013 Oct 26;382(9902):1413-23
pubmed: 23948125
Endocr J. 2017 Mar 31;64(3):363-367
pubmed: 27980239