Initiative for Burnout of ICU Caregivers: Feasibility and Preliminary Results of a Psychological Support.


Journal

Journal of intensive care medicine
ISSN: 1525-1489
Titre abrégé: J Intensive Care Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8610344

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 13 4 2018
medline: 20 2 2021
entrez: 13 4 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Intensive care unit (ICU) caregivers are at high risk of burnout and the shortage of this highly specialized personal is a problem. The feasibility and impact of a psychological intervention were never assessed in this special context. A randomized controlled single-blind study in an ICU. The first intervention consisted in weekly problem-based sessions led by psychologists with small groups of caregivers using a systemic approach over 3 months. The modified intervention was lead for 9 months. The scores of Maslach Burnout Inventory and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were compared between the intervention and control groups, before and after the intervention. One-hundred and sixty six caregivers were randomized in intervention and control groups. The major finding was the way the psychologists could modify the original methodology in order to enable caregivers to attend the sessions. Burnout scores tended to decrease across the whole ICU team after the intervention period, more in the intervention group. Participation in the study was poor at 6 months after intervention. This is the first study attempting to evaluate a psychological intervention on the mental health of ICU caregivers. It shows a modified method of a psychological support with a systemic approach in the special environment of ICU. Notwithstanding the modest results related to the short length of the process and the turnover of the personal, we demonstrated that such an approach is feasible. Further studies on larger scale and of longer duration are needed to investigate the effect of such interventions on the mental health of ICU caregivers.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Intensive care unit (ICU) caregivers are at high risk of burnout and the shortage of this highly specialized personal is a problem. The feasibility and impact of a psychological intervention were never assessed in this special context.
METHODS METHODS
A randomized controlled single-blind study in an ICU. The first intervention consisted in weekly problem-based sessions led by psychologists with small groups of caregivers using a systemic approach over 3 months. The modified intervention was lead for 9 months. The scores of Maslach Burnout Inventory and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were compared between the intervention and control groups, before and after the intervention.
RESULTS RESULTS
One-hundred and sixty six caregivers were randomized in intervention and control groups. The major finding was the way the psychologists could modify the original methodology in order to enable caregivers to attend the sessions. Burnout scores tended to decrease across the whole ICU team after the intervention period, more in the intervention group. Participation in the study was poor at 6 months after intervention.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This is the first study attempting to evaluate a psychological intervention on the mental health of ICU caregivers. It shows a modified method of a psychological support with a systemic approach in the special environment of ICU. Notwithstanding the modest results related to the short length of the process and the turnover of the personal, we demonstrated that such an approach is feasible. Further studies on larger scale and of longer duration are needed to investigate the effect of such interventions on the mental health of ICU caregivers.

Identifiants

pubmed: 29642743
doi: 10.1177/0885066618768223
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

562-569

Auteurs

Bara Ricou (B)

Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology and Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
University of Geneva, CMU, Geneva, Switzerland.

Fabienne Gigon (F)

Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology and Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
University of Geneva, CMU, Geneva, Switzerland.

Edith Durand-Steiner (E)

Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology and Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Swiss Federation of Psychologists, Bern, Switzerland.

Maud Liesenberg (M)

Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology and Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
University of Geneva, CMU, Geneva, Switzerland.

Christine Chemin-Renais (C)

Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology and Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
University of Geneva, CMU, Geneva, Switzerland.

Paolo Merlani (P)

University of Geneva, CMU, Geneva, Switzerland.
Intensive Care in Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland.

Sylvette Delaloye (S)

Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology and Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH