Diagnostic Value of Transluminal Attenuation Gradient for the Presence of Ischemia as Defined by Fractional Flow Reserve and Quantitative Positron Emission Tomography.
coronary artery disease
coronary computed tomography angiography
fractional flow reserve
positron emission tomography
transluminal attenuation gradient
Journal
JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
ISSN: 1876-7591
Titre abrégé: JACC Cardiovasc Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101467978
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2019
02 2019
Historique:
received:
23
08
2017
revised:
05
10
2017
accepted:
05
10
2017
pubmed:
19
12
2017
medline:
14
1
2020
entrez:
18
12
2017
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to investigate the incremental diagnostic value of transluminal attenuation gradient (TAG), TAG with corrected contrast opacification (TAG-CCO), and transluminal diameter gradient (TDG) over coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA)-derived diameter stenosis alone for the identification of ischemia as defined by both the invasive reference standard fractional flow reserve (FFR) and the noninvasive reference standard quantitative positron emission tomography (PET). In addition to anatomic information obtained by coronary CTA, several functional CT parameters have been proposed to identify hemodynamically significant lesions more accurately, such as TAG, TAG-CCO, and more recently TDG. However, clinical validation studies have reported conflicting results, and a recent study has suggested that TAG may be affected by changes in vessel diameter. Patients with suspected coronary artery disease underwent coronary CTA and [ A total of 557 (91.9%) coronary arteries of 201 patients were included for analysis. TAG, TAG-CCO, and TDG did not discriminate between vessels with or without ischemia as defined by either PET or FFR. Furthermore, these parameters did not have incremental diagnostic accuracy over coronary CTA alone for the presence of ischemia as defined by PET and FFR. There was a significant correlation between TDG and TAG (r = 0.47; p < 0.001) and between TDG and TAG-CCO (r = 0.37; p < 0.001). TAG, TAG-CCO, and TDG do not provide incremental diagnostic value over coronary CTA alone for the presence of ischemia as defined by [
Sections du résumé
OBJECTIVES
The aim of this study was to investigate the incremental diagnostic value of transluminal attenuation gradient (TAG), TAG with corrected contrast opacification (TAG-CCO), and transluminal diameter gradient (TDG) over coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA)-derived diameter stenosis alone for the identification of ischemia as defined by both the invasive reference standard fractional flow reserve (FFR) and the noninvasive reference standard quantitative positron emission tomography (PET).
BACKGROUND
In addition to anatomic information obtained by coronary CTA, several functional CT parameters have been proposed to identify hemodynamically significant lesions more accurately, such as TAG, TAG-CCO, and more recently TDG. However, clinical validation studies have reported conflicting results, and a recent study has suggested that TAG may be affected by changes in vessel diameter.
METHODS
Patients with suspected coronary artery disease underwent coronary CTA and [
RESULTS
A total of 557 (91.9%) coronary arteries of 201 patients were included for analysis. TAG, TAG-CCO, and TDG did not discriminate between vessels with or without ischemia as defined by either PET or FFR. Furthermore, these parameters did not have incremental diagnostic accuracy over coronary CTA alone for the presence of ischemia as defined by PET and FFR. There was a significant correlation between TDG and TAG (r = 0.47; p < 0.001) and between TDG and TAG-CCO (r = 0.37; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
TAG, TAG-CCO, and TDG do not provide incremental diagnostic value over coronary CTA alone for the presence of ischemia as defined by [
Identifiants
pubmed: 29248645
pii: S1936-878X(17)30990-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.10.009
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
323-333Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.